¹« ·¨ ÆÀ ÂÛ |
ΩԸ¹«Æ½Èç´óË®¹ö¹ö£¬Ê¹¹«ÒåÈ罺ÓÌÏÌÏ£¡ |
³¬Ô½¹ú¼Ò¡ª¡ªÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨µÄÅ·ÖÞ»¯ºÍÈ«Çò»¯*
×÷Õߣº[Òâ] ¼ªÑÇÉ£ÍС¤¼ÓÄÉÄá** Öø ÀîÈÊÕæ*** Áõ éó**** Òë
Õª Òª: ´«Í³µÄÐÐÕþ·¨¹ÛÄîÒÔ·¨ÂÉʵ֤Ö÷Ò塢ȨÁ¦·ÖÁ¢ÀíÂۺ͹«¹²ÐÐÕþÓÅÒæÀíÂÛΪ»ù´¡£¬ÈÏΪÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨Ö²¸ùÓÚÒ»¹ú¶ÀÌØµÄÕþÖκÍÉç»á´«Í³Ö®ÖУ¬´Ó¶ø·ñÈÏÆä¿ç¹úÐÔ¡£ÓÚÊÇ£¬ÐÐÕþÐÐΪ³ÉΪÁËÐÐÕþ·¨Ñ§Ñо¿µÄºËÐÄ£¬¶øÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòºÍÅÐÀý·¨Ôò³¤ÆÚΪ·¨Ñ§¼ÒÃÇËùºöÊÓ¡£ÈÕÒæÇ¿»¯µÄÅ·ÖÞÒ»Ì廯ºÍ¾¼ÃÈ«Çò»¯½ø³Ì¶ÔÉÏÊö¹ÛÄîÌá³öÁËÌôÕ½¡£Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÁ¢·¨²»µ«¸³ÓèÁËÅ·ÖÞÐÐÕþ»ú¹¹¹ã·ºµÄÐÐÕþȨÁ¦£¬¶øÇÒ»¹Îª¸÷³ÉÔ±¹úµÄÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨´´ÉèÁËͳһµÄ±ê×¼¡£Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå˾·¨»úÖÆ¡¢Å·ÖÞÈËȨ±£ÕÏ»úÖÆºÍÊÀ½çóÒ××éÖ¯Õù¶Ë½â¾ö»úÖÆÔòͨ¹ýÅÐÀý·¨·¢Õ¹ÁËÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨µÄ»ù±¾ÔÔò¡£ÕâЩÔÔòºÍ¹æÔòÔ´ÓÚ¸÷³ÉÔ±¹úµÄ·¨ÂÉÖÈÐò£¬µ«ÊÇÈ´ÓÐ×ÅÆÕ±éµÄÊÊÓÃÐÔ£¬²»µ«Äܹ»Ô¼ÊøÓйصĹú¼Ê×éÖ¯£¬¶øÇÒ»¹Äܹ»Ô¼ÊøÆä³ÉÔ±¹ú¡£Òò´Ë£¬Ãæ¶ÔеĿç¹úÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨£¬±ØÐëÞðÆú´«Í³µÄµ¥Ò»Ö÷Ȩ¹ÛÄîºÍȨÁ¦·ÖÁ¢¹ÛÄ¶øÒÔ¡°¹²Í¬·¨¡±µÄ¹ÛÄîÀ´Öع¹ÆäÀíÂÛ»ù´¡¡£
¹Ø¼ü´Ê£ºÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨ Å·ÖÞÐÐÕþ·¨ ÊÀ½çóÒ××éÖ¯ Õýµ±³ÌÐò
³¤ÆÚÒÔÀ´£¬ÐÐÕþ·¨Ò»Ö±±»ÈÏΪÊǹú¼ÒÖ÷ÒåµÄ¡°ÁìµØ¡±£¨enclave£©¡£È»¶ø£¬ÊÜÅ·ÖÞÒ»Ì廯½ø³ÌµÄÓ°Ï죬ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÒѾ·¢ÉúÁ˱仯¡£ÎÞÂÛÊÇÅ·ÖÞÀíÊ»ᣨthe Council of Europe£©£¬»¹ÊÇ¡¶Å·ÖÞÈËȨ¹«Ô¼¡·£¨the European Convention on Human Rights, ECHR£©£¬¶¼ÔÚ¶Ô³ÉÔ±¹úµÄÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòºÍ¹æÔò²úÉúÔ½À´Ô½´óµÄÓ°Ï졣ŷÖÞ¹²Í¬Ì壨the European Community£¬ EC£©µÄÓ°ÏìÔò¸ü´ó£¬ËüÏÞÖÆÁ˳ÉÔ±¹úµÄ³ÌÐò×ÔÖΣ¨procedural autonomy£©¡£¸ü½øÒ»²½µÄ±ä»¯Ô´ÓÚÊÀ½çóÒ××éÖ¯£¨WTO£©×¨¼ÒС×éËù²û·¢µÄÐÐÕþ·¨ÔÔò£¬ÖîÈç»ñµÃÌýÖ¤µÄȨÀûºÍ˵Ã÷ÀíÓɵÄÒªÇó£¬ÕâЩÔÔò±»ÓÃÀ´·ÀÖ¹ÐÐÕþÐÐΪÒ컯ΪÈÎÒâµÄºÍ²»Õýµ±µÄÆçÊÓ¡£Óɴ˱ã²úÉúÁËÕâÑùÒ»¸öÎÊÌ⣬¼´ÕâÒ»±ä»¯½«»á¶ÔÀíÂÛºÍʵ¼ù²úÉúʲôÑùµÄÓ°Ï죿ÎÒÈÏΪ£¬ÐµĿç¹úÐÐÕþ·¨ÐèÒªÒ»¸öÇ¡µ±µÄÀíÂÛ»ù´¡£¬¶øÇÒÕâÒ»ÀíÂÛ»ù´¡²»Ó¦ÊÇ´«Í³µÄ¹ú¼Ò¹ÛÄî¡£
Ò»¡¢ÐÐÕþ·¨ÉϵÄÁ½ÖÖ¹ÛÄî
ÔÚ¡¶Å·ÖÞ·¨ÂÉÊ·µ¼ÂÛ¡·Ò»ÊéÖУ¬ÆÏÌÑÑÀ·¨ÂÉʷѧ¼Ò°²¶«Äá°Â¡¤M¡¤º£Ë¹ÅË£¨Antonio M. Hespanha£©¿ªÃżûɽµØÖ¸³ö£º¡°¼¸ºõÔÚÕû¸öÀúÊ·³¤ºÓÖУ¬Å·Ö޵ķ¨ÂÉÒ»Ö±¾ÍÊÇÒ»ÖÖÅ·ÖÞ·¨¡£¾¡¹ÜÆäÖеÄһЩµØ·½ÐÔÌØµã¸÷²»Ïàͬ£¬µ«ÊÇËüÃÇÈ´ÓÐ×ÅһϵÁÐÆÕ±éÐԵĹ²Í¬ÌØÕ÷¡£Òò´Ë£¬àóÓÚµ¥¸ö¹ú¼ÒµÄ·¶Î§ÄÚÀ´¿¼²ìÅ·ÖÞ·¨ÂɵÄÀúÊ·ÊDz»ÇÐʵ¼ÊµÄ¡£¡±[1] ÕâÒ»Â۶ϱ»Ô½À´Ô½¶àµÄÑо¿Å·ÖÞ·¨ÂÉÌåϵÀúÊ·µÄÖøÊöËù֤ʵ¡£ÕâЩѧÊõ³É¹ûÒ»·½Ãæ±íÃ÷£¬Ãñ·¨·¨ÏµºÍÆÕͨ·¨ÏµÖ®¼äµÄ¡°ÏÔÖø²îÒ족£¨great divide£©ÕýÔÚÏà¶Ô»¯£»ÁíÒ»·½ÃæÒ²Ç¿µ÷£¬Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÄÚ²¿ÈÕÒæÇ¿»¯µÄ·¨ÂÉÒ»Ì廯Ëù²úÉúµÄÓ°ÏìÓë´ú±í¹²Í¬·¨Ê±´ú£¨the age of jus commune£©µÄ·¨ÂɶàÔªÖ÷Ò壨legal pluralism£©ÆÄΪÏàËÆ¡£[2] Õâ±ãÒý·¢ÁËÀíÂÛºÍʵ¼ùÁ½¸ö·½ÃæµÄÎÊÌ⣬¼´ÕâЩ±ä»¯²»½ö¶Ô˽·¨£¬¶øÇÒÒ²¶Ô¹«·¨£¬ÌرðÊÇÐÐÕþ·¨£¬Äܹ»²úÉú¶à´ó³Ì¶ÈµÄÓ°Ïì¡£
ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬³¤ÆÚÒÔÀ´£¬ÎÞÂÛÊǹ«¹²ÐÐÕþ£¬»¹ÊÇÐÐÕþ·¨Öƶȶ¼±»ÊÓΪ¹ú¼ÒÖ÷Ò壨nationalism£©µÄ×îºó¡°ÁìµØ¡±£¨the last enclaves£©£¬²¢ÇÒºÜÉÙÓÐѧÕßÔËÓñȽϵķ½·¨¶ÔÖ®½øÐзÖÎö¡£Ç±ÔڵĹÛÄîÊÇ£¬ÕâÖֱȽÏÊǺÁÎÞÒâÒåµÄ¡£µÄÈ·£¬½ØÈ»²»Í¬µÄÖÆ¶ÈºÍÔÔòºÜÄѱ»ÈÏΪͬÊôÒ»¸ö¡°Ìåϵ¡±£¨family£©£¬[3] ÕâÒ»µã²»Í¬ÓÚ˽·¨ÉϵÄÖÆ¶ÈºÍÔÔò¡£Ã¿¸ö¹ú¼ÒµÄ¹«¹²ÐÐÕþºÍÐÐÕþ·¨Öƶȶ¼Ö²¸ùÓÚÆä×ÔÉí·¨ÂÉÌåϵµÄÕþÖκÍÉç»á´«Í³Ö®ÖС£[4]
µ«ÊÇ£¬×î½üµÄÑо¿³É¹ûÒѾ¶ÔÉÏÊö¹ÛµãÌá³öÁËÌôÕ½¡£ÕâЩÑо¿³É¹ûÏÔʾ£¬×Ô´ÓÄÃÆÆÂØÄ£Ê½£¨the Napoleonic model£©[5]¿ªÊ¼ÔÚÅ·ÖÞ´óÂ½ÍÆ¹ãÒÔÀ´£¬·¨ÂÉÖÆ¶ÈµÄ¡°½è¼ø¡±£¨borrowings£©¡¢¡°Òý½ø¡±£¨importations£©ºÍ¡°ÒÆÖ²¡±£¨transplants£©ÔÚ¹«·¨ÁìÓòÖÐÒ²Äܹ»·¢Éú¡£ÓÚÊÇ£¬¶þÊ®ÊÀ¼ÍÆßÊ®Äê´úÄ©ÒÔÀ´£¬¹«·¨Ñ§ÕßÃÇÒ»Ö±ÔÚÇ¿µ÷²»Í¬ÐÐÕþÌåϵ֮¼äµÄÏ໥×÷Óã¬ÌرðÊÇÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåµÄÓ°Ï죬ÀýÈçÕë¶Ô¹«¹²×éÖ¯µÄÔðÈÎÎÊÌâ¡£[6] ÓйØÖîÈçÅ·ÖÞÀíÊ»áºÍ¡¶Å·ÖÞÈËȨ¹«Ô¼¡·µÈÆäËûÅ·ÖÞ×éÖ¯×÷ÓõÄÑо¿³É¹û£¨¸üΪÉÙ¼û£©£¬ÒѾÔÚÕâÒ»ÎÊÌâÉÏÓÐÁ˸üÉîÈëµÄÈÏʶ¡£[7]
¾Í±¾ÎĶøÑÔ£¬ÎÒÈÏΪ£¬ËùÓÐÕâЩÑо¿³É¹û¶¼Ó¦ÔÚijÖ̶ֳÈÉϱ»¿´×÷Êǹ«·¨Ñ§ÕßÃǼ¯ÌåÖǻ۵Ľᾧ¡£Òò´Ë£¬ÎÒÖØµã¹Ø×¢ÁíÍâÁ½¸öÎÊÌâ¡£ÆäÒ»£¬ÕâÖֱ仯ÔÚ¶à´ó³Ì¶ÈÉÏÏÞÓÚÅ·ÖÞÕþÖÎÎę̀µÄ·¶Î§ÄÚ²¢Êܵ½ÆäÖеij¬¹ú¼Ò×éÖ¯µÄÓ°Ï졣ͨ¹ý·ÖÎöÊÀ½çóÒ××éÖ¯£¨WTO£©×¨¼ÒС×é²û·¢µÄеÄÐÐÕþ·¨ÔÔò£¬ÎÒ½«¼òµ¥µØ·ÖÎöÕâÒ»ÎÊÌâ¡£Ò»µ©ÎÒÃÇÇ¡µ±µØ·ÖÎöÁËÄÇЩ³¬¹ú¼Ò×éÖ¯ºÍ¹ú¼Ê×éÖ¯ÔÚÐÐÕþ·¨µÄÖØ¹¹·½Ãæ·¢»ÓÁ˶à´óµÄ×÷Ó㬸ü½øÒ»²½µÄÎÊÌâ±ãÓ¦Ô˶øÉú£¬¼´ÕâÖÖÖØ¹¹ÔÚÀíÂÛºÍʵ¼ù·½ÃæÓкÎÓ°Ïì¡£ÞðÆú´«Í³ÐÐÕþ·¨¹ÛÄîµÄÀíÂÛ»ù´¡£¬¶ø²»Êǽö½ö½«ÆäÖÃÓÚ´ÎÒªµØÎ»£¬½«²»½ö»á´øÀ´Ò»Ð©ÖƶÈÐԵı仯£¬»¹»áÒý·¢ÐÐÕþ·¨ÀíÄîµÄ¸ïС£
¶þ¡¢×÷Ϊ¹ú¼ÒÖ÷Òå¡°ÁìµØ¡±µÄÐÐÕþ·¨
¾Í±¾ÎĶøÑÔ£¬Õ¹¿ªÂÛÊöµÄ×î¼Ñ·½·¨ÎÞÒÉÊÇÊ×ÏȼòÒªµØ½éÉÜÐÐÕþ·¨ÉϵĴ«Í³¹ÛÄÕâÖÖ¹ÛÄîÈÏΪÐÐÕþ·¨Êǹú¼ÒÖ÷ÒåµÄ¡°ÁìµØ¡±£¨province£©¡£ÕâÒ»ÈÏʶԴÓÚÒÔÏÂÈý¸ö»ù±¾µÄ·¨ÂÉ˼³±£º·¨ÂÉʵ֤Ö÷Ò壨legal positivism£©¡¢È¨Á¦·ÖÁ¢ÀíÂÛ£¨the separation of powers£©ºÍ¹«¹²ÐÐÕþÓÅÒæÀíÂÛ£¨the supremacy of public administration£©¡£
·¨ÂÉʵ֤Ö÷ÒåÊÇ´ó½·¨ÎÄ»¯µÄÒ»°ãÌØÕ÷¡£È»¶ø£¬Õâһ˼³±ÔÚ¹«·¨ÁìÓòÖÐÈ´²úÉúÁ˼«ÎªÖØÒªµÄ¶ÀÌØÓ°Ïì¡£·¨ÂÉʵ֤Ö÷Òå²»µ«ÈÏΪ·¨ÂÉÊÇÁ¢·¨»î¶¯µÄ½á¹û£¬¶øÇÒ»¹ÈÏΪ·¨ÂÉÀ´Ô´ÓÚ¹ú¼Ò¡£½á¹ûÊÇ£¬ºÜÉÙÓÐѧÕßÑо¿Ï°¹ßÔì·¨£¬¾¡¹Üϰ¹ßÒ»Ö±ÔÚ·¢Õ¹£¬ÌرðÊÇÔÚ£¨µ«²»¾ÖÏÞÓÚ£©ÏÜ·¨ÁìÓòÖС£¶øÇÒ£¬·¨¹Ù´´ÖƵķ¨ÂÉҲûÓб»ÏµÍ³µØÑо¿£¬¾¡¹ÜÕâÖÖ·¨ÂÉÑÜÉúÁËÐÐÕþ·¨ºÍÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòµÄÒ»°ãÔÔòºÍ»ù±¾ÀíÄÓÈÆäÔÚ·¨¹úºÍÒâ´óÀû¡£
µÂ¹úµÄ·¨Ñ§Ñ§Ëµ¼°Æä¹ØÓÚ¹ú¼ÒµÄ¹ÛÄîºÍÂÛÖ¤·½·¨[ÌØ±ðÊǰÂÍØ¡¤ÂõÒ®£¨Otto Mayer£©ºÍÒ®ÀïÄÚ¿Ë£¨Jellinek£©µÄ˼Ïë]ΪȨÁ¦·ÖÁ¢ºÍ¹«¹²ÐÐÕþÓÅÒæÌṩÁ˼áʵµÄÀíÂÛ»ù´¡¡£ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬°ÂÍØ¡¤ÂõÒ®ÊÇÒÔÑϸñµÄȨÁ¦·ÖÁ¢ÔÔòΪ»ù´¡¹¹½¨ÆäÐÐÕþ·¨Ñ§µÄÀíÂÛÌåϵµÄ¡£Òò´Ë£¬ÓëÁ¢·¨ºÍ˾·¨Ò»Ñù£¬ÐÐÕþÒ²ÓÐÆä×ÔÉíµÄ¾ö²ß×÷Ó㬾ßÌåÐÐÕþÐÐΪ£¨Verwaltungsakt£©±ã±»¸³ÓèÁËÔÚ¾ßÌåµÄ¸ö°¸ÖнâÊÍ·¨ÂɵŦÄÜ¡£[8] Ôڵ¹ú£¬ÕâÒ»¹ÛÄîΪÁ¢·¨Ëù½ÓÊÜ£¨became jus receptum£©£¬ÓйØÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòµÄ»ù±¾·¨£¨¡¶Áª°îÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨¡·£¬Verwaltungsverfahrengesetz£©µÚ35Ìõ¶Ô´Ë×÷Á˹涨¡£Í¬Ñù£¬·¨¹úºÍÒâ´óÀûµÄ·¨Ñ§Ñ§ËµÒ²ÈÏʶµ½ÁËÄÇÐ©ÌØÊâµÄ¡¢ÔËÓùú¼ÒͳÖÎȨÒÔÏÞÖÆ¹«ÃñȨÀûºÍ×ÔÓɵÄÐÐÕþ¾ö²ß¹¦ÄÜ£¨d¨¦cisions administratives, provvedimenti amministrativi£©¡£ÕýÈç°¢¶û²®ÌØ¡¤V¡¤´÷Î÷£¨Albert Venn Dicey£©ÔÚÆÀÂÛ·¨¹úÐÐÕþ·¨£¨French droit administrative£©Ê±ÔøÖ¸³öµÄÄÇÑù£¬Õâ±íÃ÷ÁËÐÐÕþ»ú¹ØÏà¶ÔÓÚ˽ÈË×éÖ¯µÄÓÅÒæÐÔ£¬ÒòΪǰÕßΪºóÕßÈ·Á¢ÁË·¨ÂɹæÔò£¬¶ø²»ÊDZ»ÖÃÓÚͬÑùµÄ·¨ÂɹæÔò֮ϡ£[9]
ÔÚ¶þÊ®ÊÀ¼Íǰ°ëÒ¶µÄµÂ¹úºÍÒâ´óÀû£¬ÕâÒ»¹ÛÄîһֱûÓÐÊܵ½ÌôÕ½£¬²¢²úÉúÁËÁ½¸ö·½ÃæµÄÖØÒªÓ°Ïì¡£Ò»·½ÃæÊÇ·¨Ñ§Ñ§ËµºÍ·¨Ôº¶¼ÆÕ±é¹Ø×¢ÐÐÕþÐÐΪ£¨administrative acts£©£¬¶ø·ÇÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò¡£ÀýÈ磬ÔÚÒâ´óÀû£¬¸ÅÀ¨Ñо¿ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòµÄµÚÒ»±¾Öø×÷½ö½ö½«ÆäÊÓΪ×÷³öÐÐÕþ¾ö¶¨Ç°µÄһϵÁл£¬ÕâÑù±ãÔÚѧÊõ²ãÃæÉϽ«·¨ÔºµÄʵ¼ÊÐèҪȷ¶¨ÎªÅжÏÄÄЩÐÐÕþ¾ö¶¨Ó¦µ±Êܵ½Éó²é¡£[10] ½ü¶þÊ®Äêºó£¬ÐÐÕþÐÐΪ£¨atto amministrativo£©ÈÔÈ»ÊÇ·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯µÄºËÐÄ¡£[11] ¾¡¹ÜÈç´Ë£¬ÒÔ¿¶øÉ£¨Kelsen£©Ìá³öµÄ·¨ÂɹæÔòÖÆ¶¨ºÍÊÊÓñ˴˶ÀÁ¢µÄÀíÂÛΪָµ¼£¬°ÂµØÀûÓÚ1925Äêͨ¹ýÁ˹ØÓÚ³ÌÐòµÄ»ù±¾Á¢·¨£¬ÃÀ¹úÓÚ1946ÄêҲͨ¹ýÁËÏàͬµÄÁ¢·¨£¨¼´¡¶Áª°îÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨¡·£¬the Federal Administrative Procedures Act£¬APA£©£¬ËæºóÊÇÎ÷°àÑÀ1958ÄêµÄÁ¢·¨¡£[12] µÂ¹úÓÚ1976Äê¡¢Òâ´óÀûÓÚ1990ÄêÒ²Ïà¼Ìͨ¹ýÁËÀàËÆµÄÁ¢·¨¡£
µÚ¶þ¸ö·½ÃæµÄÓ°ÏìÔòÓëÅ·ÖÞÓÐןüΪÃÜÇеÄÁªÏµ¡£ÔÚÒâ´óÀû£¬¶þÊ®ÊÀ¼Í×îÖøÃûµÄ¹«·¨Ñ§Õß¡ª¡ªÂíÎ÷Ä·¡¤S¡¤¼ÓÄᣨMassimo Severo Giannini£©ÈÏΪ£¬¾¡¹ÜÔÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå·¨ÖУ¬Êܵ¥¸ö³ÉÔ±¹úÐÐÕþ·¨ÖƶÈÓ°ÏìµÄ¹æÔòºÍ¸ÅÄîÐÔ¹¤¾ß±È±È½ÔÊÇ£¬µ«ÊÇ»ùÓÚÖÁÉÙÁ½¸ö·½ÃæµÄÀíÓÉ£¬ÔÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåµÄ²ãÃæÉϲ»¿ÉÄÜ´æÔÚ¶ÀÁ¢µÄÐÐÕþ·¨¡£ÆäÒ»ÔÚÓÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåµÄ¾ÖÏÞÐÔ£ºÔÚËû¿´À´£¬Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ì岻ͬÓÚ¹ú¼Ò£¬ÒòΪËü²¢²»ÊÇÒ»¸öÆÕ±éÐԵĹ«¹²È¨Á¦Ö÷Ìå¡£Æä¶þÔÚÓÚÕâÑùÒ»¸öÊÂʵ£¬¼´¸öÈ˲¢²»ÍêÈ«ÊÇÅ·¹²Ìå·¨ÂÉÖÈÐòµÄÖ÷Ìå¡£[13] ÔÚÎÒÃÇ¿´À´£¬¸üÎªÖØÒªµÄ²¢²»ÔÚÓÚ¶ÔÕâÁ½¸ö·½ÃæµÄÀíÓÉÌá³öÅúÆÀ£¨ÌرðÊǵڶþ¸ö·½ÃæµÄÀíÓÉ£¬²»·ûºÏһЩ»ù±¾¾¼Ã×ÔÓÉÒѾµÃµ½È·ÈϵÄÊÂʵ£©£¬¶øÊÇÇ¿µ÷´«Í³µÄ¹ú¼Ò¹ÛÄîÈÔÈ»ÊǵóöÉÏÊö½áÂÛµÄÀíÂÛ»ù´¡¡£
ÔÚͬһʱÆÚ£¬Ôø¾ÐÖú¼ª¶÷¡¤ÄªÄÚ£¨Jean Monnet£©Éè¼ÆÅ·ÖÞú¸Ö¹²Í¬Ì壨the European Coal and Steel Community, ECSC£©×éÖ¯¿ò¼ÜµÄ·¨¹úÖøÃû¹ú¼Ê·¨Ñ§Õß±£ÂÞ¡¤ºúµÂ£¨Paul Reuter£©Ö¸³ö£¬Èç¹û´æÔÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÐÐÕþ·¨£¬ÄÇôÆäÄÚÈݱãÏÞÓÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå»ú¹¹µÄÄÚ²¿ÔË×÷£¨droit de la fonction publique£©ºÍÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ì忪֧µÄÄÚ²¿¹ÜÀí£¨droit financier£©¡£[14]
¼ÓÄáºÍºúµÂ¶¼ÕýÈ·µØÈÏʶµ½£¬ÔÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÄÚ²¿ÒѾ³õ¶¶ËÄßµÄÐÂÐÐÕþ·¨²»Í¬Óڴ󽷨ϵµÄÐÐÕþ·¨¡£ÌرðÊÇ£¬²¢Ã»ÓÐÒ»ÖÖÀàËÆÓÚ¾ßÌåÐÐÕþÐÐΪ£¨Verwaltungsakt£©µÄ¹²Í¬ÌåÐÐΪ£¬ÉõÖÁҲûÓÐÄÇЩÄܹ»²¢ÇÒÒ²¾³£²úÉúÆÕ±éÐÔЧÁ¦µÄ¾ö¶¨¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬ËûÃǶ¼ºöÊÓÁËһЩÏÖʵÇé¿ö¡£Å·ÖÞú¸Ö¹²Í¬ÌåµÄ×î¸ß»ú¹¹£¨the High Authority£©ÒѾ±»ÊÚÓè¶Ô³ÉÔ±¹úÆóÒµ·¢²¼ÃüÁîºÍÊµÊ©ÖÆ²ÃµÄȨÁ¦¡£Òò´Ë£¬ÆäÐÐΪ±ØÐë½ÓÊÜÅ·ÖÞ·¨Ôº£¨the European Court of Justice, ECJ£©µÄ˾·¨Éó²é¡£Ëæºó£¬¡¶Å·ÖÞ¾¼Ã¹²Í¬ÌåÌõÔ¼¡·£¨the EEC Treaty£©´´ÉèÁ˾ºÕùÁìÓòÖеÄÖ±½ÓÐÐÕþ£¬1962ÄêµÄ»ù±¾ÌõÀý[15] ÔÚũҵ·½Ã渳ÓèÁËÅ·ÖÞίԱ»á£¨the Commission£©ÆäËûµÄÐÐÕþÖ°ÄÜ¡£
´Ëºó£¬Çé¿öÓÐÁËÏÔÖøµÄ±ä»¯¡£×÷Ϊһ¸ö·´Â¢¶Ï×éÖ¯£¬Å·ÖÞίԱ»á±»ÊÚÓèÁ˺ܶàеÄÐÐÕþȨÁ¦£¬ÌرðÊÇÔڼ沢ºÍÊÕ¹º·½Ã棨µÚ4064/1989ºÅÌõÀý£©¡£Ëü»¹ÏíÓÐʵʩÏÖ³¡¼ì²é£¨on ¨Cthe ¨Cspot checks£©µÄȨÁ¦£¨µÚ1/2003ºÅÌõÀý£©¡£ÔÚũҵÕþ²ß·½Ã棬¾¡¹ÜÏÖÐз¨ÂÉ¿ò¼Ü½«ÈÕ³£ÐÐÕþÖ°ÄÜÁô¸øÁ˳ÉÔ±¹úµÄÓйز¿Ãźͻú¹¹£¬µ«ÈÔÊÚÓèÅ·ÖÞίԱ»á¼à¶½È¨¡£ÕâÑù£¬Î¥·´Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ì广ÔòµÄÐÐΪ£¬½«»áµ¼ÖÂÑÏÖØµÄ¾¼Ãºó¹û¡£½á¹ûÊÇ£¬ÔÚÈÕÒæÔö³¤µÄÉç»áÐèÇ󣨻òÕß˵ÖÁÉÙÊdzɹ¦µÄʩѹ¼¯ÍÅ£©µÄѹÁ¦Ï£¬²¢»ùÓÚÔöÇ¿µØÇøºÍÉç»áÄý¾ÛÁ¦µÄÌØÊ⿼ÂÇ£¬Å·ÖÞÐÐÕþÒѾÔÚÊÕÈëºÍ²Æ¸»µÄÔÙ·ÖÅä·½Ãæ³Ðµ£ÁËеÄÖ°ÄÜ¡£Í¬Ê±£¬Ò»Ð©×¨Òµ»¯µÄÐÐÕþ»ú¹¹Ò²ÒѾ½¨Á¢ÆðÀ´¡£Í¨³££¬ËüÃÇÊÕ¼¯²¢·¢²¼ÐÅÏ¢£¬¿ªÕ¹ËùνµÄ¡°ÐÅÏ¢¼à¹Ü¡±£¨regulation by information£©¡£[16] µ«ÊÇ£¬ÔÚijЩÇé¿öÏ£¬ÀýÈçÔÚÉÌ±ê·½Ãæ£¬ËüÃÇÒ²Ö±½ÓÕë¶ÔÆóÒµ×÷³ö¾ö¶¨¡£
ÐÐÕþÐÐΪµÄ˾·¨Éó²éÒ²ÒѾ·¢ÉúÁ˱仯¡£Ò»¸öеijõÉó·¨Ôº£¨court of first instance, CFI£©ÒѾ³ÉÁ¢£¬Ö÷Òª¸ºÔðÉó²éÐÐÕþÐÐΪ¡£¶øÇÒ£¬Å·ÖÞ·¨ÔºÒѾÖð½¥²¢ÇÒÎȹ̵ØÇ¿»¯ÁËÆä¶Ô³ÉÔ±¹ú³ÌÐò·¨ÔÔòºÍ¹æÔòµÄÓ°Ïì¡£ÕâÁ½¸ö·½ÃæµÄз¢Õ¹¶¼ÖµµÃÃÜÇйØ×¢¡£
Èý¡¢Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåµÄÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨£º´Ó Automec °¸µ½ max.mobil Telekommunikation °¸
ËäÈ»µ±Ç°ÓйØÅ·ÖÞÐÐÕþ·¨µÄÑо¿¼¸ºõ¶¼ºÁÎÞÀýÍâµØ¹Ø×¢Å·ÖÞ·¨Ôº£¬µ«³õÉó·¨ÔºµÄÅÐÀý·¨Äܹ»¸üÇå³þµØ½ÒʾÒѾ·¢ÉúµÄ±ä»¯¡£ÒÔÏÂÁ½·ÝÅоöÆÄÓÐÒâÒå¡£µÚÒ»·ÝÅоöÓë1990ÄêµÄ Automec °¸Óйء£Ôڸð¸ÖУ¬³õÉó·¨Ôº³ÐÈÏÅ·ÖÞίԱ»áÔÚ×÷³ö·´Â¢¶Ï¾ö¶¨Ê±ÔËÓÃÁË¡°ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò¡±(administrative procedures)£¬¾¡¹Ü³õÉó·¨Ôº²¢Î´ÔÚ´Ë»ù´¡ÉϵóöÈκξßÌåµÄ½áÂÛ¡£[17]
Ê®¶þÄêÒԺ󣬳õÉó·¨ÔºÔÚ max.mobil Telekommunikation °¸[18] ÖеóöÁËÃ÷È·µÄ½áÂÛ¡£ÕâÊÇÒ»¸öÇëÇóÐû¸æÎÞЧ֮Ëߣ¬ÉóÀí¶ÔÏóÊÇÅ·ÖÞίԱ»áÒÀ¾Ý¡¶Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÌõÔ¼¡·µÚ86ÌõµÚ3½Ú£¨ÔΪµÚ90ÌõµÚ3½Ú£©×÷³öµÄ²»¶Ô°ÂµØÀûÌáÆðËßËϵľö¶¨¡£ÔÚÎÒÃÇ¿´À´£¬¸Ã°¸µÄÖ÷ÒªÎÊÌâÔÚÓÚÕâÑùÒ»¸öÊÂʵ£¬¼´³õÉó·¨ÔºÈÏΪ¸Ã¾ö¶¨ÊÇͨ¹ýÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò×÷³öµÄ£¬[19] ²¢ËæºóµÃ³öÁ½¸ö·½ÃæµÄ½áÂÛ¡£
Ê×ÏÈ£¬ÔÚºÎʱ±ØÐëÆô¶¯ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòÕâÒ»ÎÊÌâÉÏ£¬Å·ÖÞίԱ»áÏíÓй㷺µÄ×ÔÓɲÃÁ¿È¨¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬ÕâÖÖ×ÔÓɲÃÁ¿È¨Ó¦¸Ã×ñÑÉÆÒâÐÐÕþÔÔò£¨the principle of good administration£©¡£¸ÃÔÔòÊdzÉÔ±¹úÏÜÕþ´«Í³Öй²Í¬µÄ¡°·¨Öιú¼Ò¡±£¨RechtsStaat£©»ù±¾ÔÔòµÄÒ»¸ö·½Ãæ¡£[20] ÕâÑù£¬Å·ÖÞίԱ»á±ã¸ºÓÐÇÚÃãºÍ¹«ÕýµØ×÷³öÐÐΪµÄÒåÎñ£¬°üÀ¨È·ÈÏ˽ÈË×éÖ¯ÏíÓеijÌÐòÐÔȨÀû¡£[21]
´ËÍ⣬Ïà¶ÔÓÚ˽ÈË×éÖ¯¶øÑÔ£¬Å·ÖÞίԱ»á»¹ÓмලŷÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå·¨ÕýÈ·ÊÊÓõÄÒ»°ãÒåÎñ¡£Õâ±ãÒâζ×Å£¬Å·ÖÞίԱ»áÓÐÔðÈÎÊʵ±ÇÚÃãºÍ¹«ÕýµØ¿¼ÂÇÀ´×Ô˽ÈË×éÖ¯µÄËùÓÐÐÅÏ¢£¬µ«Õâ²¢²»±ØÈ»±íÃ÷Ëü±ØÐë×÷³öÒ»Ïî¾ö¶¨»òÕß·¢²¼Ò»ÏîÖ¸Áî¡£ºÁÎÞÒÉÎÊ£¬ÎªÁËʵÏÖ¡°¹«ÕýÉÆÒâÐÐÕþ¡±£¨interests of a good administration of justice£©²¢×ñѳÉÔ±¹úÏÜÕþ´«Í³Öй²Í¬µÄ·¨Öιú¼Ò£¨RechtsStaat£©»ù±¾ÔÔò£¬Å·ÖÞίԱ»áµÄÐÐΪӦµ±½ÓÊÜ˾·¨Éó²é¡£ÕâÒ»µãÒѾ±»2000ÄêÔÚÄá˹£¨Nice£©×¯ÑÏͨ¹ýµÄ¡¶»ù±¾È¨ÀûÏÜÕ¡·£¨the Charter of Fundamental Rights£©µÚ47ÌõËùÈ·ÈÏ[µ«ÊÇ£¬ÒòΪµÂ¹úµÄ·¨Öιú¼Ò£¨RechtsStaat£©¹ÛÄîºÍ·¨¹úµÄ·¨Âɹú¼Ò£¨Etat de droit£©¹ÛÄî¶¼ÊÇÒÔ¹ú¼ÒÏÈÓÚÏÜÕþ°²ÅŶø´æÔÚµÄÕþÖκͷ¨ÂÉ˼ÏëΪ»ù´¡µÄ£¬ËùÒÔʹÓá°·¨ÖΡ±£¨the Rule of law£©Ò»´Ê¸üΪǡµ±¡£][22]
ËùÓÐÕâÒ»Çж¼±íÃ÷£¬¡¶Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÌõÔ¼¡·£¨EC Treaty£©µÚ226Ìõ¹æ¶¨µÄ³ÌÐò[23] ÓÐÁËÖØÒª·¢Õ¹£¬¶øÕâÒ»±ä»¯Ò²ÓÐÆäËûµÄÔÒò¡£[24] ³ÌÐò·¨ÓÐןüΪ¹ã·ºµÄ±ä»¯¡£ËäȻѧÕßÃÇÔÚʹÓÃÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò£¨administrative procedure£©ÕâÒ»¸ÅÄîʱ²»¾¡ÑϽ÷£¬[25] µ«³õÉó·¨Ôº¶Ô³ÌÐò¸ÅÄîµÄÔËÓÃÈ´²¢·ÇÊÇÐðÊöÐԵģ¨descriptive£©£¬¶øÊǹ涨ÐԵģ¨prescriptive£©¡£[26] ³ÌÐòÕâÒ»¸ÅÄîÓëÃñ·¨Ï°¹ßÖвƲú£¨property£©µÄ¸ÅÄîÒ»Ñù£¬ËüÉæ¼°È¨ÀûºÍÔðÈη½ÃæµÄһϵÁз¨Âɺó¹û¡£ ´Ó¸ü¹ã·ºµÄÒâÒåÉϽ²£¬ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòºÍÔÔò²»ÔÙ¾ÖÏÞÓÚµ¥¸öÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå³ÉÔ±¹ú£¬¶øÊÇÆÕ±éµØÊÊÓÃÓÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå¡£²¢ÇÒ£¬ÕâÐèÒª´«Í³ÀíÄîµÄ¸ïС£
ËÄ¡¢Å·ÖÞ·¨Óë¹ú¼Ò×ÔÖÎ
Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåºÍÆäËûÅ·ÖÞ×éÖ¯¶Ô°üÀ¨ÐÐÕþ·¨ÔÚÄڵijÉÔ±¹ú·¨ÂÉÖÈÐòµÄÓ°Ï죬ÊÇ´«Í³µÄÐÐÕþ·¨ÀíÄî²»ÔÙ·ûºÏÏÖʵµÄÁíÒ»ÔÒò¡£
1977Ä꣬ŷÖÞÀíÊ»áͨ¹ýÁËÒ»Ïî¹ØÓÚ¡¶±£»¤¸öÈËȨÀû²»ÊÜÐÐÕþµ±¾ÖÐÐΪÇÖº¦¡·£¨Protection of the individual in relation to the acts of administrative authorities£©µÄ¾öÒ飬ȷÁ¢ÁËÎå¸ö·½ÃæµÄȨÀûºÍÔðÈΡ£ËüÃÇ·Ö±ðÊÇ£º»ñµÃÌýÖ¤µÄȨÀû£¬»ñÈ¡±ØÒªÊÂʵµÄȨÀûÒÔ¼°»ñÈ¡·¨Âɽ¨ÒéµÄȨÀû£»ËµÃ÷ÀíÓɵÄÔðÈκÍÌṩ˾·¨Éó²é»úÖÆµÄÔðÈΡ£ÈýÄêºó£¬²¿³¤Î¯Ô±»á£¨the Committee of Ministers£©²ÉÄÉÁËÁíÍâÒ»Ïî¹ØÓÚ¡¶ÐÐÕþµ±¾Ö×ÔÓɲÃÁ¿È¨µÄÔËÓ᷵Ľ¨Òé£¬ÌØ±ðµØÈ·Á¢Á˹«Æ½£¨impartiality£©ÔÔò¡¢±ÈÀý£¨proportionality£©ÔÔòºÍºÏÀíʱÏÞ£¨reasonable time-limits£©ÔÔò¡£¡¶Å·ÖÞÈËȨ¹«Ô¼¡·¶Ô³ÉÔ±¹úµÄ³ÌÐò·¨ÓÐןü´óµÄÓ°Ï죬ÒòΪËüËùÈ·ÈϵÄȨÀû¹¹³ÉÁËÒ»ÖÖ¸üΪ¼áʵµÄºÏ·¨ÐÔ±ê×¼¡£¶øÇÒ£¬Ëü»¹È·±£Á˸ü¸ßˮƽµÄ£¬²¢ÇҾͷÀÖ¹¹«¹²È¨Á¦ÀÄÓûòÕß´íÎóÐÐʹ¶øÑÔ£¬ÊǸüΪÓÐЧµÄ˾·¨Éó²é¡£ÀýÈ磬ÔÚÒâ´óÀû£¬¡°·´ÏòÕ÷µØ¡±£¨accessione invertita£©µÄ×ö·¨£¨ÊÇÒ»ÖÖÊÂʵÉϵÄûÊղƲú£¬ÔÚÆäʵÌåÐÐΪʵʩǰûÓÐÈκÎÁ¢·¨ÒÀ¾Ý»òÕß³ÌÐòÐÔ±£ÕÏ£©£¬¾¡¹ÜµÃµ½ÁËÉÏËß·¨Ôº£¨the Corte di cassazione£©¡ª¡ª×î¸ßÆÕͨ·¨ÔºµÄÈϿɣ¬µ«ÒѾ±»¡¶Å·ÖÞÈËȨ¹«Ô¼¡·Ðû¸æÎª·Ç·¨¡£[27] ×î½ü£¬Õë¶Ô³ÇÊй滮ÎÊÌ⣬¡¶Å·ÖÞÈËȨ¹«Ô¼¡·ÈÏΪ£¬Î´¶Ô˽ÈËÒµÖ÷¸øÓèÈκξ¼Ã²¹³¥µÄ³¤ÆÚ¹æ»®ÏÞÖÆ»á´òÆÆ£¨upset£©ÉçÇøÕûÌåÀûÒæÓë±£»¤¸öÈË»ù±¾È¨ÀûÖ®¼äµÄºÏÀíÆ½ºâ¡£[28]
È»¶ø£¬Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåµÄÓ°Ïì¸ü´ó¡£¾¡¹ÜÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåûÓз¢²¼Ò»°ãÐÐÕþ·¨¹æÔòµÄȨÁ¦£¬[29] µ«ÊÇÅ·ÖÞ·¨ÔºµÄÅÐÀý·¨È´·¢Õ¹ÁËÐÐÕþ·¨µÄ»ù±¾ÔÔò£¬²¢ÇÒÕâЩ»ù±¾ÔÔò¶Ô³ÉÔ±¹ú·¨ÔººÍÐÐÕþµ±¾Ö¶¼¾ßÓÐÔ¼ÊøÁ¦¡£ÖÚËùÖÜÖª£¬Å·ÖÞ·¨ÔºÒѾ´Ó³ÉÔ±¹úµÄ·¨ÂÉÖÈÐòÖÐÎüÊÕÁËһЩ·¨ÂÉÔÔòºÍÏà¹ØµÄ¸ÅÄîÐÔ¹¤¾ß£¬[30] ²¢¶ÔËüÃǼÓÒÔÐÞÕý£¬ÓÐʱҲ½øÐÐÌæ»»¡£[31] Å·ÖÞ·¨Ôº»¹½«·¨µÄÒ»°ãÔÔò£¬Èç˵Ã÷ÀíÓɵÄÒåÎñºÍÈ·±£Õë¶ÔÐÐÕþÐÐΪ»ñµÃ˾·¨±£»¤µÄÒåÎñ£¬×÷ΪÏÞÖÆ³ÉÔ±¹ú³ÌÐò×ÔÖεÄÊֶΡ£[32] ÕâÒâζ×Å£¬·¨¹ÙµÄȨÁ¦ÓÐÁ˹㷺µÄºÍ¿ª´´ÐÔµÄÀ©ÕÅ¡£ÕâÖÖÀ©ÕŲ»µ«´´ÉèÁË·¨ÂÉÔÔò£¬Ò²ÓÐÕþ²ßÐÔµÄÓ°Ïì¡£¾¡¹ÜÈç´Ë£¬ÔÚÄÇЩ¹Ø×¢Å·ÖÞ·¨ÔºË¾·¨Äܶ¯ÐÔ£¨activism£©µÄѧÕßÃÇÖУ¬ºÜÉÙÓÐÈË¶ÔÆäÔËÓÃÒòÑÏÈÀýÀíÂÛÀ´´´ÉèÆÕ±éÐÔÔÔòºÍ¹æÔòµÄ×ö·¨£¨ÀýÈçÔÚÕþ¸®ÔðÈη½Ã棩Ìá³öÅúÆÀ¡£[33]
ͬʱ£¬Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÁ¢·¨Ô½À´Ô½Í»³öµÄÖØÒªÐÔÒ²²»ÈݺöÊÓ¡£ÕâÖÖÖØÒªÐÔÏÔ¶øÒ×¼û£¬²»µ«ÒòΪŷÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÖ¸Ádirectives£©ÎªÄ³Ð©ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò£¨ÀýÈçÕþ¸®²É¹º£©´´ÉèÁËÒ»¸öȫеķ¨ÂÉ¿ò¼Ü£¬Ò²ÒòΪÕâЩָÁîҪô²¿·ÖµØ¸ÄÔìÁËijЩ³ÌÐò£¨ÀýÈçÔÚÓйػ·¾³Ó°ÏìÆÀ¼ÛµÄ°¸¼þÖУ©£¬ÒªÃ´Îª³ÌÐòÐÔ±£ÕÏÉèÁ¢ÁËÒ»¸öÆÕ±éÐԵıê×¼¡£ÌرðÊÇ£¬µÚ89/665ºÅ¹ØÓÚ¹«¹²²É¹ºµÄÖ¸Á¹æ¶¨£¬³ÉÔ±¹úÓÐÈ·±£Ë½È˵±ÊÂÈË¿ÉÒÔ¾ÍÆäËùÔâÊܵÄÈ«²¿ËðʧºÍ/»òÕßË𺦻ñµÃ¾¼Ã²¹³¥µÄÒåÎñ¡£Ò»ÖÖ¡°¹²Í¬µÄ¾È¼Ã·¨¡±£¨common law of remedies£©±ãÓÉ´ËÐγɡ£[34] ÀýÈ磬ÔÚÒâ´óÀû£¬ËüÒѾµ»¯ÁËÖ÷¹ÛȨÀû£¨subjective rights£©ÓëºÏ·¨ÀûÒæ£¨legitimate interests£©Ö®¼äµÄ½çÏÞ£¬ÒòΪºóÕß²»ÔÙÓ뾼ò¹³¥ÎÞÔµ¡£
Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ì幨ÓÚµçÐŵÄÖ¸ÁîÓÐÁ˸üÉîÈëµÄ·¢Õ¹¡£µÚÒ»ÅúÖ¸ÁîÈ·Á¢ÁËһЩ»ù±¾ÔÔò£¨±ÈÀýÔÔò¡¢¿Í¹ÛÐÔÔÔòºÍ·ÇÆçÊÓÔÔò£©£¬²¢ÒÔÒ»°ãµÄºÍ¸ö±ðµÄÅú×¼Ìæ´úÁËÐí¿ÉÖ¤£¬¶øµÚ¶þÅúÖ¸ÁîÔòÈ·Á¢Á˹ÜÖÆ»ú¹¹£¨¼´ÄÇЩΪ·´Â¢¶Ï»ú¹¹ºÍÅ·ÖÞίԱ»áÌṩ×Éѯ¡¢ºÏ×÷ºÍÐÅÏ¢µÄ»ú¹¹£©µÄ¼¸ÏîÔðÈβ¢´´ÉèÁ˳ÌÐòÐÔȨÀû¡£Ê×ÏÈ£¬¡°¿ò¼ÜÐÔ¡±Ö¸Áî¹æ¶¨Á˸æÖªºÍÉê±ç³ÌÐòµÄÔËÓ㨵Ú2002/20ºÅÖ¸ÁîµÚ6Ìõ£©¡£Æä´Î£¬¸ÃÖ¸Áî¹æ¶¨£¬Õë¶Ô¹ÜÖÆ»ú¹¹µÄ¾ö¶¨£¬¶¼±ØÐëÌṩ˾·¨ÐÔ»òÕß׼˾·¨ÐԵľȼ㨵Ú4Ìõ£©¡£µÚÈý£¬¸ÃÖ¸ÁîÒªÇóËùÓÐÏà¹ØµÄÐÅÏ¢±ØÐ빫¿ª£¨µÚ5Ìõ£©¡£[35]
ÉÏÊö±ä»¯ÏÞÖÆÁ˳ÉÔ±¹úµÄ³ÌÐòÐÔÔÔò£¬¾¡¹ÜÔÚ¶þÊ®ÊÀ¼Í°ËÊ®Äê´úÐÂ˾·¨Äܶ¯Ö÷ÒåʱÆÚ£¨the new activist period£©Ö®Ç°£¬Å·ÖÞ·¨Ôº¾ÍÒѾÈÏʶµ½Á˳ÌÐò×ÔÖεÄÖØÒªÐÔ¡£ÔÚ Saarland °¸ÖУ¬Å·ÖÞ·¨ÔºÈÏΪ£º1.¡°ÔÚ¹²Í¬Ì广ÔòûÓÐÕë¶ÔÕâÒ»ÊÂÏîµÄÏà¹Ø¹æ¶¨Ê±£¬¸ù¾Ýÿ¸ö³ÉÔ±¹úµÄ¹úÄÚ·¨È·¶¨ÓйÜϽȨµÄ·¨Ôº£¬²¢¾ö¶¨¶Ô¹«Ãñ»ùÓÚ¹²Í¬Ìå·¨µÄÖ±½ÓЧÁ¦ËùÏíÓеÄȨÀû¸øÓè±£»¤¡±£»2. µ«ÊÇ£¬³ÌÐòÐÔ¹æÔò²»Ó¦±ÈÄÇЩµ÷ÕûÀàËÆ¹úÄÚÐÐΪµÄ¹æÔò¸üΪ²»Àû£¬Ò²²»Ó¦Ê¹Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåËù¸³ÓèµÄȨÀû²»¿ÉÄÜ»òÕß¹ýÓÚÀ§ÄѵØÐÐʹ¡£[36] ÔÚ×î½üµÄÒ»·Ý¹ØÓÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÐÐÕþµ±¾ÖÔðÈεÄÅоöÖУ¬Å·ÖÞ·¨Ôº¼á³ÖÁËÉÏÊö¿´·¨£¬²¢ÈÏΪÈç¹ûûÓй²Í¬ÊÊÓõĹæÔò£¬³ÉÔ±¹úµ±¾Ö±ØÐëÊÊÓøóÉÔ±¹ú¹æÔò¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬ÕâÑù×öµÄǰÌáÊÇ£¬²»Ó¦Ê¹°üÀ¨»ù±¾ÔÔòÔÚÄÚµÄÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå·¨µÄÓÐЧÐÔÊܵ½Íþв¡£[37] ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬ÔÚÒԺ󰸼þ£¬Èç Peterbroeck °¸µÄÅоöÖУ¬Å·ÖÞ·¨ÔºÈÏΪ£¬»ñµÃ˾·¨±£»¤µÄȨÀûÒªÇó³ÉÔ±¹úµÄÐÐΪӦµ±¾ßÓÐÏàËÆÐÔ£¬¼´Ï൱ÐÔÔÔò£¨the principle of equivalence£©£¬Óɴ˱ãÏÞÖÆÁ˳ÉÔ±¹úµÄ³ÌÐò×ÔÖΡ£[38]
Å·ÖÞ·¨Ôº¶ÔÕâÖÖ³ÌÐò×ÔÖεÄ×ðÖØ³Ì¶ÈºóÀ´ÓÐËùϽµ£¬ÕâÒ»ÊÂʵÒý·¢ÁËÓÐЧÐÔ£¨effectiveness£©ºÍÕýµ±ÐÔ£¨legitimacy£©Á½¸ö·½ÃæµÄÎÊÌâ¡£¾ÍǰÕß¶øÑÔ£¬ÓйسÌÐòÐÔÔÔòºÍ¹æÔòµÄ·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯µÄ¶àÔªÐÔ¿ÉÄÜÑÜÉú³ö¶àÖÖ¶àÑùÇÒ¸üΪÓÐЧµÄ·½·¨£¬ÕâЩ·½·¨Äܹ»¾µÃÆð¼ìÑé²¢±»Òý½ø£¬¶ø·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯µÄµ¥Ò»ÐÔÈ´»á×è°ÕâЩ·½·¨µÄÊÔÐкÍÒÆÖ²¡£¾ÍºóÕß¶øÑÔ£¬·¨Âɲ»½ö½öÊÇÒ»ÕûÌ×ÔÚʱ¼äºÍ¿Õ¼äÉÏÒ×ÓÚת»»µÄ¹¤¾ß£¬¶øÊÇÖ²¸ùÓÚÆäËùÀµÒÔ·¢Õ¹µÄÉç»áÖ®ÖС£»»ÑÔÖ®£¬´æÔÚÒ»ÖÖÓ¦Óèά»¤µÄÉç»á¼ÛÖµ¡£ÕâÒ»µãÒѾ±»Å·ÃËÏÜ·¨ËùÈϿɣ¬¡¶Å·ÖÞÁªÃËÌõÔ¼¡·£¨TEU£©µÚ6.3Ìõ£¨ÒÔǰΪµÚFÌõ£©¹æ¶¨£¬ÁªÃË×ðÖØÆä³ÉÔ±¹úµÄ¹ú¼ÒµØÎ»¡£²¢ÇÒ£¬¡¶»ù±¾È¨ÀûÏÜÕ¡·£¨ the Charter of Fundamental Rights£©µÚ23ÌõÒ²ÉêÃ÷£¬ÁªÃË×ðÖØÎÄ»¯µÄ¶àÔªÐÔ¡£Õâ±íÃ÷£¬Óë¸÷ÖÖÎÄ»¯²îÒìÒ»Ñù£¬³ÌÐòµÄ¶àÑùÐÔ²»Ó¦±»¿´×÷ÊÇÒ»Ì廯µÄÕϰ£¬¶øÓ¦±»¿´×÷ÊÇÒ»ÖÖÓ¦Óè×ðÖØµÄÉç»áºÍ·¨ÂɼÛÖµ¡£
Îå¡¢ÔÚWTO¿ò¼ÜÄÚÐγɡ°È«ÇòÐÔ¡±µÄ³ÌÐò·¨ÔÔò
±¾ÎÄÒѾָ³ö£¬ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòÓÐ×ÅÔ½À´Ô½Ã÷ÏÔµÄÅ·ÖÞ»¯Ç÷ÊÆ¡£È»¶ø£¬ÔÚеĹú¼Ê×éÖ¯µÄÓ°ÏìÏ£¬¸üеÄÇ÷ÊÆÊÇÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòµÄÈ«Çò»¯¡£Ò»¸öÖµµÃ×¢ÒâµÄÀýÖ¤±ãÊÇÊÀ½çóÒ××éÖ¯£¨WTO£©µÄÅÐÀý·¨¡£ÆäÖУ¬Ò»Ð©»ù±¾µÄ·¨ÂÉÔÔòÒѾ±»¸ºÔð½â¾ö³ÉÔ±·½Ö®¼ä¾À·×µÄר¼ÒС×飨panels£©ºÍÉÏËß»ú¹¹£¨the Appellate Body, AB£©ÈϿɺÍÖ´ÐС£²¢ÇÒ£¬ÕâЩÔÔò²»½öÄܹ»Ô¼ÊøWTOµÄ׼˾·¨»ú¹¹£¬»¹Äܹ»Ô¼ÊøÆäµÞÔ¼·½¡£
¾Í»ù±¾µÄ·¨ÂÉÔÔò¶øÑÔ£¬ÔÚ×î½üÓë°ÍÎ÷Óйصö°¸¼þÖУ¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹ÈÏΪ£¬×¨¼ÒС×éµÄ½áÂÛ±ØÐë¾¹ýÍÆÀí¡£[39] ÁíÒ»Ì×ÔÔòÔÚ¹ØÓÚ¡°ÏººÍº£¹ê¡±µÄϵÁа¸¼þÖеõ½Ðûʾ¡£ÔÚÕ⼸¸ö°¸¼þÖУ¬ÃÀ¹úÓë°üÀ¨Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÔÚÄ򵀮äËûµÞÔ¼·½·¢ÉúÁËÕù¶Ë¡£ÉÏËß»ú¹¹²Ã¾öÈÏΪ£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹ºÍר¼ÒС×é¾ùÓÐȨ»ñÈ¡ÄÇЩ±»ÈÏΪÓë°¸¼þÉóÀíÓйصÄÐÅÏ¢¡£ÓÚÊÇ£¬ËûÃDz»µ«¿ÉÒÔ´ÓµÞÔ¼·½£¬Ò²¿ÉÒÔ´Ó·ÇÕþ¸®×éÖ¯ÄÇÀïѰÇó»òÕß½ÓÊÜÎļþ¡£¾¡¹Ü´Ó¼¼ÊõÉϽ²£¬ÕâЩµÞÔ¼·½ºÍ·ÇÕþ¸®×éÖ¯²¢²»ÊÇWTOÕù¶Ë½â¾ö³ÌÐòÖÐÌØ¶¨Õù¶ËµÄµ±Ê·½¡£[40]
ÔÚͬһ·Ý²Ã¾öÖУ¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹Ìá³öÁËÒ»ÖÖеġ°WTO±£»¤ÀûÒæÀíÂÛ¡±£¨theory of the interests protected by the WTO£©£¬²¢ÇÒÒÔ´ËΪ»ù´¡´´ÉèÁËÒ»Ð©Ô¼Êø³ÉÔ±·½ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐòµÄÔÔò¡£×¨¼ÒС×éÈÏΪ£¬À©´ó»õÎïºÍ·þÎñµÄóÒ×ÊÇWTO»ù±¾µÄ£¬¾¡¹Ü²»ÊÇΨһµÄ×ÚÖ¼¡£ÕâÒâζ×Å£¬ÆäËûΪ·¨ÂÉËùÈ·ÈϵĹ²Í¬ÀûÒæ£¬Èç»·¾³±£»¤£¬Ö»ÄÜÓɸ÷¸ö¹ú¼ÒÏíÓС£Ïà·´£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹È´ÈÏΪ£¬ÕâÖÖÌØ¶¨ÀûÒæÒ²ÊôÓÚWTO±ØÐëÈ·±£»ñµÃ³ä·Ö±£ÕϵÄÊÂÏÒòΪ±£»¤°üÀ¨Ïñº£¹êÕâÑùµÄÉúÎïÎïÖÖÔÚÄڵġ°¿ÉÓýß×ÔÈ»×ÊÔ´¡±£¨exhaustible natural resources£©ÊÇÆäÔðÈΡ£[41] Òò´Ë£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹ÈÏΪ£¬¡¶ÂíÀ¿¦Ê²ÌõÔ¼¡·£¨the Marrakech Treaty£©Ê¹µÃÄÇЩ·ûºÏWTOж¨ÐòÑÔÃ÷È·ÐûʾµÄ¿É³ÖÐø·¢Õ¹Ä¿±ê²¢Ö¼ÔÚ±£»¤×ÔÈ»×ÊÔ´µÄ¹ú¼ÒÐÐΪºÏ·¨»¯£¬Ö»ÒªÕâЩÐÐΪÔÚ±¾ÖÊÉϲ»ÊÇÈÎÒâµÄ»òÕß²»¹«ÕýµÄ£¬²¢ÇÒ²»»áÔÚ¾ßÓÐÏàͬÌõ¼þµÄ¹ú¼ÒÖ®¼äÔì³ÉÆçÊÓ¡£[42]
¶øÇÒ£¬¸üÖØÒªµÄÊÇ£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹²Ã¾öÈÏΪ£¬µÞÔ¼·½µÄȨÁ¦Êܵ½Á½¸ö·½ÃæµÄÏÞÖÆ¡£Ò»·½Ã棬ËûÃDz»µÃµ¥·½ÃæµØ²ÉÈ¡´ëÊ©£¬ÌرðÊÇÈç¹ûÕâÑù×öÎ¥·´ÁËGATTµÄ¹æ¶¨£¬Õ⽫ÓÐËðÓÚWTO¶à±ßóÒ×ÌåÖÆ¡£ËûÃDZØÐëͨ¹ýÏñ»·¾³±£»¤·½ÃæµÄÄÇÖÖË«±ß»òÕß¶à±ßж¨À´Ðµ÷Ï໥֮¼äµÄÀûÒæ¹ØÏµ¡£[43] ÃÀ¹úδÄÜÓëÆäËûµÞÔ¼·½½øÐÐÕýʽµÄ̸ÅУ¬ÒÔ´ï³ÉÉÏÊöж¨¡£ÉÏËß»ú¹¹²»µ«ÈÏΪÕâÊDz»ºÏ·¨µÄ£¬¶øÇÒ»¹´Ó¡¶ÂíÀ¿¦Ê²ÌõÔ¼¡·ÖÐÍÆ³öÒ»ÏîÔÔò£¬¼´ËùÓеÞÔ¼·½¶¼±ØÐë»ñµÃ¡°½øÐÐ̸ÅеÄÀàËÆ»ú»á¡±£¨similar opportunities to negotiate£©¡£ÕâÒ»ÔÔòÓëÄÇÖÖÈÏΪһ¹ú¿ÉÒÔ¾ø¶Ô×ÔÖ÷µØÐÐʹÆä¶ÔÍâȨÁ¦µÄ´«Í³¹ÛÄî½ØÈ»²»Í¬¡£[44]
ÁíÒ»·½Ã棬³ÉÔ±¹úµÄ¹æÔòÖÆ¶¨³ÌÐòºÍ²Ã¾ö£¨Èç°ä·¢Ö¤Ê飩³ÌÐò¶¼±ØÐë×ñÑÕýµ±³ÌÐò£¨due process£©ÔÔò¡£ÃÀ¹úµÄ³ÌÐò¹æÔòÎ¥±³ÁËÕâÒ»ÔÔò£¬ÆäÊ×ÒªÔÒòÊÇ£¬ÔÚ°ä·¢Ö¤ÊéµÄ³ÌÐòÖУ¬ÉêÇë¹úûÓлñµÃÌýÖ¤µÄÕýʽ»ú»á¡£²¢ÇÒ£¬ÃÀ¹úÒ²¡°Ã»ÓÐ×÷³öÕýʽµÄ¡¢ÊéÃæµÄºÍºÏÀíµÄ¾ö¶¨¡£¡±[45]
ÐèÒªÔÙ´ÎÇ¿µ÷µÄÊÇ£¬ÎÊÌâµÄ¹Ø¼ü²¢²»½ö½öÔÚÓÚÕâÖÖÐÐÕþÐÐΪ¿ÉÄܲ¢ÇÒÊÂʵÉϵÄÈ·µ¼ÖÂÁËÈÎÒâµÄºÍ²»¹«ÕýµÄÆçÊÓ¡£ÔÚÎÒÃÇ¿´À´£¬Ç±ÔÚµÄÔÔòÖÁÉÙÒ²ÊÇͬµÈÖØÒªµÄ¡£ÕâЩÔÔò±íÃ÷£º1. ±ØÐëÓС°»ñµÃÌýÖ¤µÄÕýʽ»ú»á¡±£¨formal opportunity to be heard£©£»2. ³ÉÔ±¹úµ±¾Ö±ØÐë×ñѺÏÀíÐÔ£¨reasonableness£©ÔÔò¡¢±ÈÀý£¨proportionality£©ÔÔò[46] ºÍÉÆÒ⣨good faith£©ÔÔò[47]£»3. ³ÉÔ±¹úµ±¾Ö±ØÐëÌá³ö³ä·ÖµÄÀíÓÉ£¬ÒÔ±ã½ÓÊÜ˾·¨Éó²é¡£[48] ×ܶøÑÔÖ®£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹ÒÀ¾ÝÕýµ±³ÌÐòµÄÒªÇó×÷³öÁ˾ö¶¨¡£²¢ÇÒ£¬Ò²ÕýÊÇ»ùÓÚÕâЩ³ÌÐòÐÔµÄÀíÓÉ£¬ÄÇЩּÔÚ±£»¤»·¾³µÄ´ëÊ©£¬ËäÈ»ÔÚ±¾ÖÊÉϼȷDz»ºÏ·¨£¬Ò²·Ç²»Êʵ±£¬µ«È´±»ÉÏËß»ú¹¹ÈÏΪÔÚ³ÉÔ±¹úÖ®¼äÔì³ÉÁËÈÎÒâµÄºÍ²»¹«ÕýµÄÆçÊÓ¡£
ÓÚÊÇ£¬ÓйØÕâЩÔÔòµÄÔ¨Ô´ÎÊÌâ±ãÓ¦Ô˶øÉú¡£×î³õ£¬ÓÐÈË¿ÉÄÜ»áÈÏΪ£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹ÉóÀí°¸¼þÊÇÒÔÊÊÓÃÓÚ±»Éó²éÐÐΪʵʩ¹úµÄÔÔòΪÒÀ¾ÝµÄ¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬¶ÔÉÏËß»ú¹¹±¨¸æµÄÉîÈëÑо¿±íÃ÷£¬ÕâÒ»¿´·¨ÊÇûÓÐÊÂʵ¸ù¾ÝµÄ¡£ÕâЩÔÔòÔ´ÓÚ×ÔÈ»·¨£¨jus nature£©»òÕß²»¹ýÊÇÓÉWTO׼˾·¨»ú¹¹£¨quasi-judicial bodies£©Ëù´´ÉèµÄ¿ÉÄÜÐÔҲͬÑù±»ÅųýÁË¡£ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹Ò»¹áµØ½«ÊµÖ¤Ö÷Òå·½·¨£¨positivistic approach£©ÔËÓÃÓÚ·¨ÂÉÔÔò£¬¼È¿¼Âǹú¼Ê·¨£¬Ò²¹Ë¼°¸÷³ÉÔ±·½µÄ¹úÄÚ·¨¡£ÓÚÊÇ£¬ÉÏËß»ú¹¹±ã´Ó¸÷³ÉÔ±·½µÄ·¨ÂÉÖÈÐòÖÐÌáÁ¶³öһЩ»ù±¾µÄ£¨general£©»òÕß¡°È«ÇòÐԵġ±£¨global£©ÐÐÕþ·¨ÔÔò£¬ÕâЩÔÔò´ÓÕûÌåÉÏÇ¿»¯ÁËWTOÈ·±£Õýµ±³ÌÐòÔÔòµÃµ½×ñѵÄʵ¼ù¡£
ÂÔ´ø·í´ÌÒâζµÄÊÇ£¬ÕâЩÔÔòÒѾ±»ÊÊÓÃÓÚÃÀ¹ú£¬¾¡¹ÜËüÃÇÖ÷ÒªÔ´ÓÚ°»¸ñ³¡ªÈø¿ËÑ··¨ÂÉÌåϵ£¨Anglo-Saxon legal orders£©¡£Õâ¿ÉÒÔ±»¿´×÷ÊÇÒ»¸ö±êÖ¾£ºÔÚÈ«Çò·¶Î§ÄÚ£¬¼´Ê¹ÊÇ×îÇ¿´óµÄ¹ú¼ÒÒ²±ØÐëÒÀ·¨ÂÉÐÐÊ¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬´ÓÕâ¸ö°¸¼þÖУ¬ÎÒÃÇÒ²¿ÉÒԵóöÁíÒ»¸ö½áÂÛ£¬¼´Í¨¹ýWTO£¬ÃÀ¹ú·¨ÂÉÖÈÐòÖеijÌÐòÐÔÔÔòÒѾÊÊÓÃÓÚÆäËûµÄ·¨ÂɺÍÉç»áÌåÖÆ¡£ÕâÖÖÇéÐÎÒѾ·¢ÉúÔÚ˽·¨ºÍÉÌ·¨ÁìÓòÖУ¬ÃÀ¹úÔÚ·¨ÂÉ·½ÃæµÄÖ§ÅäµØÎ»£¨hegemony£©Óɴ˱ãµÃµ½ÁËÇ¿»¯¡£[49]
ÎÞÂÛÈçºÎ£¬¾Í·¨ÂɵÄÐγɶøÑÔ£¬ÉÏÊö²Ã¾ö·´Ó³ÁËÓëÒÔÍù½ØÈ»²»Í¬µÄÇ÷ÊÆ¡£ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬ÓÉÒé»áÖÆ¶¨µÄ·¨£¨ÕâÊÇWTOµÄ»ùʯ£©²»Í¬ÓÚͨ¹ý׼˾·¨³ÌÐò´´ÖƵ퍡£ÒòΪ¾ÍºóÕß¶øÑÔ£¬Ç±ÔڵĻù±¾ÔÔòÊÇ´ÓÆäÖйéÄɳöÀ´µÄ£¬¶ø²»ÊǸö±ðµÄ¹æÔò±»ÊÊÓÃÓÚÆäÖС£ [50] Òò´Ë£¬Õë¶ÔÔÚ·¨ÂÉ´´ÖƵĹý³ÌÖУ¬ÓÉÕþ¸®´ú±í×é³ÉµÄ»ú¹¹ËùÏíÓеľø¶ÔµØÎ»£¨absolute preeminence£©Êܵ½²»µ±ÇÖÊ´µÄÏÖÏó£¬Ò»Ð©³ÉÔ±¹úÒѾ×÷³öÁË·´Ó¦£¬[51]ÕâÒ»µã±ã²»×ãÎªÆæÁË¡£
µ«ÊÇ£¬ÕâÑù×ö¸ü¶àµÄÊÇΪÁËÏÞÖÆ¸÷ÖÖÀûÒæ¼¯ÍÅ£¨Èç»·¾³±£»¤Ö÷ÒåÕßÍÅÌ壩²ÎÓë˾·¨»î¶¯£¬¶ø²»ÊÇΪÁËÏÞÖÆÄÇЩּÔÚÔ¼ÊøÖ´ÐÐÐÔȨÁ¦µÄÔÔòµÃµ½½øÒ»²½µÄ·¢Õ¹¡£ÔÚ¶àÊýÇé¿öÏ£¬ÕâÖÖ×ö·¨Ò²²»»³ÒÉÉÏÊö°¸¼þËùÌåÏֵĻù±¾·¨ÂÉÏÖʵ£¬¼´ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨²»ÔÙÊÇÅÅËûµÄ¹ú¼ÒÏÖÏó¡£ÐÐÕþ·¨À´Ô´ÓÚÕýÔÚ¡°Ñ¸ËÙ·¢Õ¹¡±£¨proliferate£©µÄ¹ú¼Ê×éÖ¯ºÍ»ú¹¹¡£[52]
Áù¡¢ÐÐÕþ·¨ÀíÄîµÄ¸ïÐÂ
ÔÚ¶þÊ®ÊÀ¼Í£¬ÐÐÕþ·¨ÒѾ·¢ÉúÁ˺ܶà±ä»¯¡£¹«¹²ÔðÈεĹÛÄîÒѾ´ÓÖ´Ðз¨ÂɺÍÃüÁ×ű£Õϸ£ÀûµÄ·½Ïò·¢Õ¹£¬²¢ÇÒ²»ÔÙÊÇÒ»³É²»±äµÄÁË¡£×î½üµÄ±ä»¯ÒѾ³¯×ÅÓë´ËÏà·´µÄ·½Ïò·¢Õ¹£¬¼´¼õÉÙͨ¹ý¹«¹²ÐÐÕþÌṩµÄÉÌÆ·ºÍ·þÎñ[Èç·Ö°ü£¨contracting out£©¡¢Î¯ÍУ¨outsourcing£©]¡£[53]
´«Í³¹ÛÄîÈÏΪ£¬ÐÐÕþÐÐΪ±íÏÖΪһÏî¾ö¶¨£¬»ùÓÚÆäȨÍþÐÔ£¬Ëü²»Í¬ÓÚ˽ÈË×éÖ¯×÷³öµÄ¾ö¶¨¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬ÐÐÕþ·¨Ëù·¢ÉúµÄ±ä»¯ÓëÕâÒ»¹ÛÄî²¢²»Ã¬¶Ü¡£ÕâЩ±ä»¯Ò²Ã»ÓÐÇÖʴDZÔÚµÄÖÆ¶ÈºÍÎÄ»¯»ù´¡£¬ÌرðÊÇÒÔ²ã¼¶ÖÆ£¨hierarchy£©£¬¶ø·ÇÒÔÔ¼Êø£¨checks£©ºÍÖÆºâ£¨balance£©Îª»ù´¡µÄȨÁ¦·ÖÁ¢¹ÛÄîÒÔ¼°ÓëÖ®Ïà¹ØµÄÄÇÖÖ¹«¹²ÀûÒæÀíÂÛ¡£ÕâÖÖÀíÂÛÈÏΪ£¬¹«¹²ÀûÒæÔÚ±¾ÖÊÉϲ»Í¬ÓÚÆäËû¾ßÓй²Í¬»òÕ߸ö±ðÐÔÖʵÄÀûÒæ¡£ÕâЩ±ä»¯Ö»ÊÇÏ÷ÈõÁË´«Í³¹ÛÄîµÄЧÁ¦¡£Ç¡Ç¡Ïà·´£¬¹ÛÄîµÄת±äÒѾÊ×ÏÈʼÓÚ¹«¹²ÐÐΪ³ÌÐòÐÔÀíÂÛµÄÌá³ö¡£Õýµ±³ÌÐòÀíÂۺ͹¤¾ßÒѾ±»ÖÚ¶àµÄÅ·ÖÞ·¨ÂÉÎļþËùÎüÊÕ£¬¾¡¹Ü·½Ê½¸÷Òì¡£³ÌÐò¹¹³ÉÁËÒ»ÖÖÕýµ±ÐÔ±ê×¼£¬Ëü²»Í¬ÓÚÔÓеÄÄÇЩÒѾµÃµ½ÆÕ±éÈϿɵÄÕýµ±ÐÔ±ê×¼£¬ÕâÒ»¹ÛÄîÒ²ÒѾ±»Á¢·¨µ±¾Ö¡¢·¨ÔººÍ·¨Ñ§¼ÒÃÇÆÕ±é½ÓÊÜ¡£[54]
¸ü½øÒ»²½µÄת±äÔ´ÓÚÅ·ÖÞÒ»Ì廯ºÍÈ«Çò»¯¡£°´ÕÕÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå·¨£¬Å·ÖÞÐÐÕþµ±¾Ö×ÜÊÇÓÐÒåÎñÔÚ×÷³öÒ»ÏîͬʱӰÏì¸öÈËÀûÒæºÍ¹²Í¬ÀûÒæµÄ¾ö¶¨Ç°Æô¶¯ÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò¡£¶øÇÒ£¬µ±Å·ÖÞίԱ»á¶Ô³ÉÔ±¹úʵʩŷÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå·¨µÄÇé¿ö½øÐмලʱ£¬ÎªÁËÂÄÐÐÖ°Ôð£¬Ëü±ØÐë½ÓÊÜ·¨ÔºµÄ˾·¨Éó²é¡£ÓÚÊÇ£¬×÷ΪÕþÖιý³ÌÌæ´úÆ·µÄÒ»ÖÖ¡°ÀûÒæ´ú±íģʽ¡±£¨interest representation model£©±ãµÃÒÔÐγɡ£[55] Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå·¨µÄÖØÒªÐÔ²»½öÔÚÓÚÆäÏà¶ÔÓÚ³ÉÔ±¹ú·¨Ëù¾ßÓеÄÓÅÔ½ÐÔ£¬¶øÇÒÒ²ÔÚÓÚÆä¼ä½ÓЧÁ¦¡£ÕâÖÖ¼ä½ÓЧÁ¦Ê¹µÃ¸÷³ÉÔ±¹ú·¨ÂÉÖÈÐòÖ®¼äµÄºÏ×÷ºÍ¾ºÕù³ÉΪ¿ÉÄÜ¡£ÓÚÊÇ£¬Ðµķ¨ÂÉÖÈÐò±ãÊÇÒ»ÖÖ¡°¸÷ÖÖÖÈÐòÖ®ÉϵÄÖÈÐò¡±£¨order of orders£©¡£Õâ²»½ö·´Ó³ÁËÁ¢·¨»ú¹¹ºÍ·¨ÔºµÄ¶àÔª»¯£¬Ò²·´Ó³ÁË·¨ÂÉÔ¨Ô´µÄ¶àÔª»¯¡£¶øÇÒ£¬ÔÚÐÂÐÎÊÆÏ£¬²»Í¬µÄ·¨ÂÉÖÈÐòÏ໥ӰÏ죬²¢Ã»ÓбíÏÖ³öÏÖ´ú¹ú¼ÒÌØÓÐµÄ²ã¼¶ÖÆ¡£
Ò»ÖÖÆÄΪÀàËÆµÄ±ä»¯ÕýÔÚWTO¿ò¼ÜÄÚ·¢Éú£¬ÒòΪÉÏËß»ú¹¹ÒªÇó³ÉÔ±¹úµÄÐÐÕþµ±¾Ö²»µ«ÔÊÐíÍâ¹ú¹«Ë¾£¬¶øÇÒÒ²ÔÊÐíÆäËû¹ú¼Ò²ÎÓë²Ã¾öºÍ¹ÜÖÆ³ÌÐò¡£[56] ÓÚÊÇ£¬Óë¹ÜÖÆÈ¨Á¦Ò»Ñù£¬Ò»¹úµÄ¶ÔÍâ»î¶¯±ã±ØÐë×ñÑÄÇЩ²»ÊÇÓɸùú×ÔÐÐÈ·¶¨µÄ£¬¶øÊÇÓÉÒ»¸ö׼˾·¨»ú¹¹´´ÉèµÄÔÔò¡£
ÕâЩ±ä»¯±íÃ÷£¬ÎÒÃDz»Ó¦µ±ÓÃÄÇÖÖÒÔ¹ú¼ÒΪÁ¢×ãµãµÄ´«Í³¹ÛÄ¼´µ¥Ò»µÄÖ÷Ȩ¹ÛÄîºÍȨÁ¦·ÖÁ¢¹ÛÄîÀ´´ÓÕûÌåÉÏÈÏʶÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨¡£ [57] Ïà·´£¬Ç¡µ±µØÈÏʶÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨ÐèÒªÔËÓÃÄÇЩÊʵ±¿¼ÂÇÀúÊ·½ø³ÌµÄÀíÂÛÄ£ÐÍ¡£·¨ÂÉʵ֤Ö÷ÒåºÍ¹ú¼ÒÖ÷ÒåÁ¢×ãÓÚ¹ú¼ÒÀ´ÈÏʶÐÐÕþ·¨¡£Óë´Ë²»Í¬£¬ÎÒÃÇ·¢ÏÖÁËÒ»¸ö¸üΪ¸´ÔÓµÄÊÀ½ç¡£ÆäÖУ¬¹ú¼ÒǡǡÊDz»µ«ÒÀÆäÄÚ²¿·¨ÂÉÖÈÐò£¨ÈçµØ·½ÐÔ·¨ÂÉ£¬ÌرðÊÇÈç¹ûÓйصĵØÇø±»ÊÚÓèÁ¢·¨È¨Á¦£©£¬Ò²ÒÀÆäÍⲿ·¨ÂÉÖÈÐò£¨ÌرðÊÇÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåºÍ¡¶Å·ÖÞÈËȨ¹«Ô¼¡·£©¶ø´æÔÚµÄÖڶ๫¹²×éÖ¯Ö®Ò»¡£ÓÚÊÇ£¬Õâ¸öÊÀ½ç±ãÓ빲ͬ·¨ÊÀ½çÆÄΪÏàËÆ¡£¹²Í¬·¨ÊÀ½ç´æÔÚÓÚÏÖ´ú¹ú¼Ò²úÉú֮ǰ£¬²¢ÇÒÒÔ·¨Ñ§¼ÒºÍ·¨¹ÙÊÊÓöà¸öÃñ×åµÄ¹²Í¬·¨£¨lex alius loci£©[58] ÎªÌØÕ÷¡£
ÖÁÉÙÔÚijÖ̶ֳÈÉÏ£¬ÕâЩ±ä»¯Ôì³ÉÁË»ìÂÒ¡£»òÕ߸üÈ·Çеؽ²£¬ÕâЩ±ä»¯µ¼ÖÂÄÇÖÖÒ»³É²»±äµÄ¼ÛÖµ¹ÛºÍÀûÒæÌåϵ²»¸´´æÔÚÁË¡£ÔÚÓÉÒé»áÈ·Á¢µÄ¼ÛÖµ¹ÛºÍÀûÒæÌåϵÖУ¬ÊÂǰÎÞ·¨ÊµÏÖÒ»¶¨³Ì¶ÈµÄÖÈÐò¡£ÕâÖÖÖÈÐòÖ»ÄÜÔÚ³ÌÐòÖÐÏÔÏÖ£¬¾¡¹Ü¾ÍºËÐÄÀûÒæ¶øÑÔ£¬ÕâЩ³ÌÐòÈÔ»á²úÉú¸÷ÖÖ²»Í¬µÄ½á¹û¡£ÕâͬÑù»áÔì³É²»¹«Õý£¬ÐèÒª·¨Ñ§¼ÒÃÇ×÷³öеÄŬÁ¦¡£¹«¹²·¨ÂÉÔðÈΣ¨legal accountability£©µÄÎÊÌâÒ²ËæÖ®²úÉú¡£ÀýÈ磬WTOר¼ÒС×鹤×÷µÄ¹«¿ªÇé¿ö»¹Ô¶²»¾¡ÈËÒâ¡£
µ«ÊÇ£¬·¨Ñ§ÕßÃDZØÐëÇå³þ£¬ÒÔ¹ú¼ÒΪ»ù´¡µÄ´«Í³ÀíÂÛ¹¤¾ß£¬Á¬Í¬Æä»ù±¾¼ÙÉè¡¢ÏàÓ¦µÄÀûÒæºÍ·¨ÂÉÔ¨Ô´µÄ²ã¼¶ÖÆÒÔ¼°ÖÐÑ뼯ȨµÈ£¬¶¼ÎÞ·¨½â¾öÕâЩÎÊÌâ¡£Èç¹ûÎÒÃdzÐÈÏ£¨ÕýÈçÉÏÊö·ÖÎöÒѾ±íÃ÷µÄÄÇÑù£©£¬·¨ÂÉ·¢Õ¹µÄÀúÊ·¹ý³Ì²»ÊÇÁ¬ÐøµÄ£¨progressive£©£¬¶øÊÇʱ³£¾ßÓпçÔ½ÐԵģ¨discontinuity£©£¬ÄÇôÎÒÃǾͱØÈ»»áµÃ³ö½áÂÛ£º¾Í±í´ï·½Ê½£¨ÓïÑÔ¡¢¸ÅÄîºÍÍÆÀíģʽ£¬ÕâЩ¶¼²»Ó¦¸Ã²»¼ÓÅúÅеؽÓÊÜ£©ºÍ¹µÍ¨¹¤¾ß£¨Ñ§Êõ³É¹ûºÍ¿¯ÎïµÄÌåϵ£©¶øÑÔ£¬·¨Ñ§ÀíÂÛÒ²±ØÐëÃæÁÙ±ä¸ï¡£ÐµĿç¹úÐÐÕþ·¨ÐèÒªÒ»¸öÇ¡µ±µÄÀíÂÛ»ù´¡£¬¶øÕâÒ»»ù´¡²»Ó¦ÊÇ´«Í³µÄ¹ú¼Ò¹ÛÄî¡£
[Abstract] This article examines the influences that the European integration and globalization have on procedural administrative law and the need for a change of paradigm. The traditional concept of administrative law, which was founded on legal positivism, the separation of powers and the supremacy of public administration held that procedural administrative law, was rooted in the political and social traditions of its own legal system, and thus denied the existence of transnational administrative law. Consequently, administrative act had long been the focus of administrative law studies, while little attention was paid to procedures and judge-making law. Recently, such a concept went challenged by the growing European integration and globalization. The EC legislations have entrusted the European administration many functions and provided uniform standards for national administrative procedures. General principles of administrative law have also been developed in practice by the EC judicature, the ECHR and the quasi-judicial bodies of the WTO. Those principles are subsumed from national legal orders, but they are so common that they are not only binding on the international organizations but also on their member states. Therefore, the theoretical foundation of new transnational procedural administrative law should be built with the concept of jus commune, but not the traditional paradigm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ±¾Îijõ¸åÔø×÷Ϊ»áÒéÂÛÎÄÌá½»¸øÊ׽조ŷÖÞ¹«·¨¹ú¼ÊÑÐÌֻᡱ£¨Almagro, 28 June 2002£©£¬¾Ð޸ĺ󷢱íÓÚ2003Äê12Ô³ö°æµÄ¡¶Å·ÖÞ¹«·¨¡·ÔÓÖ¾£¨European
Public Law£©µÚ¾Å¾íµÚËÄÆÚ¡£±¾ÎĵÄÐ޸ĵÃÒæÓÚÓëSabino CasseseºÍCarol HarlowµÄÌÖÂÛ£¬×÷Õß¼ªÑÇÉ£ÍС¤¼ÓÄÉÄᣨGiacinto
della Cananea£©½ÌÊÚ¶ÔËûÃÇÒÔ¼°¡¶Å·ÖÞ¹«·¨¡·ÔÓÖ¾µÄÄäÃûÉó¸åÈËÉî±í¸Ðл¡£
** Òâ´óÀûÅ·ÖÞ´óѧ£¨European University Institute£©ÕÜѧ²©Ê¿£¨Ph. D£©£¬ÏÖÈΰ¢±Ïŵ´óѧ£¨University of Urbino£©ÕþÖÎѧԺ·¨ÂÉϵÖ÷ÈΣ¬ÐÐÕþ·¨Ñ§È«Ö°½ÌÊÚ¡£
*** Î人´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº½ÌÊÚ£¬²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éúµ¼Ê¦¡£
**** Î人´óѧ·¨Ñ§Ôº¹ú¼Ê·¨×¨Òµ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú¡£
ÔÚ´Ë£¬ÒëÕ߸Ðл×÷ÕßÒÔ¼°¡¶Å·ÖÞ¹«·¨¡·ÔÓÖ¾±à¼Birkinshaw½ÌÊÚ¶Ô±¾ÎÄ·ÒëµÄ»Ý×¼ºÍÖ§³Ö¡£´ËÍ⣬ÒëÕß»¹Òª¸ÐлÃÀ¹ú˹̹¸£´óѧµÄ J. H. Merryman½ÌÊÚ¡¢Ó¢¹úÅ£½ò´óѧµÄP. Brand½ÌÊÚ¡¢Òâ´óÀûÌØÂØÍдóѧ£¨University of Trento£©µÄ D. Quaglioni½ÌÊÚ¡¢²®Â¡ÄÉ´óѧ£¨Bologna University£©µÄ P. Prodi½ÌÊÚÒÔ¼°°¢±Ïŵ´óѧµÄ M. L. Napolitano²©Ê¿ºÍM. Gnes ²©Ê¿£¬ËûÃÇΪ±¾ÎĵķÒëÌṩÁËÐí¶àÆÄÓмÛÖµµÄ×ÊÁϺͽ¨Òé¡£
[1] A.M. Hespanha, Panorama historico da cultura juridica europea (1999), Òâ´óÀûÓïÒ뱾Ϊ Introduzione alla storia del diritto europeo, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1999, p. 4£»¸ÃÊéÓ¢ÎÄÒë±¾ÓÉ×÷Õß·Òë¡£¹ØÓÚÅ·ÖÞ´ó½·¨ÖеĹ²Í¬·¨£¨jus commune£©ºÍÓ¢ÃÀ·¨ÖÐµÄÆÕͨ·¨£¨common law£©Ö®Çø±ð£¬²Î¼û chapter 5 of J.M. Kelly, A Short History of Western Legal Thought, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992.
[2] M. Ascheri, Istituzioni medievali: una introduzione, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1994; P. Grossi, L¡¯ordine giuridico medieovale, Bari, Laterza, 1995; R.C. van Caenegem, European Law in the Past and the Future, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. ×÷Õßͬǰ£¬Áí²Î¼û Judges, Legislators and Professors. Chapters in European Legal History (1987). J.P. Dawson ÒѾָ³öÁË¡°·¨¹úÆ«À롱£¨French deviation£©µÄÏÖÏ󣬲μûThe Oracles of the Law, Westport, Greenwood Press, 1985.£¨·¨¹úÔÚ×ʲú½×¼¶¸ïÃüºóÞðÆúÁËÔÓеÄÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬·¨´«Í³£¬½¨Á¢ÁËȫеÄ×ʲú½×¼¶·¨ÂÉÌåϵ¡£ÕâÒ»ÏÖÏó±»³ÆÎª¡°·¨¹úÆ«À롱¡£ÃϵÂ˹ð¯µÈ·¨¹úÆôÃÉ˼Ïë¼Ò¹ØÓÚȨÁ¦·ÖÁ¢µÄÀíÂÛÊÇÕâÒ»¡°Æ«À롱µÄ˼Ïë»ù´¡¡£Ëü²»½ö´ßÉúÁËеķ¨ÂÉ˼ά·½·¨£¬¶øÇÒ¶ÔÓÚ·¨¹úµÄ˾·¨×éÖ¯ºÍ˾·¨ÐÐÕþ¡¢ÊµÌå·¨ºÍ³ÌÐò·¨¶¼²úÉúÁËÖØ´óÓ°Ïì¡£²Î¼û J. H. Merryman, ¡®The French Deviation¡¯, in: Am. J. of Com. L. (44), 1995, p. 109. ¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡££©
[3] ¹ØÓÚÕâÒ»¹ÛÄ²Î¼û R. David, Les grands syst¨¨mes de droit , Paris, Dalloz, 1985. ¹ØÓÚ¹«·¨µÄרÃÅÂÛÊö£¬²Î¼û M. Fromont, Grands syst¨¨mes de droit ¨¦trangers, Paris, Dalloz, 1998, 3th ed.
[4] ²Î¼û A. Plantey, Prospective de l¡¯Etat, Paris, Pedone, 1975.
[5] ·¨À¼Î÷µÚÒ»µÛ¹ú½¨Á¢ÒÔºó£¬ÎªÁ˹®¹Ì×ʲú½×¼¶¸ïÃüµÄʤÀû³É¹û£¬´Ù½ø×ʱ¾Ö÷Ò徼õķ¢Õ¹£¬Ïû³ýÒÔÍùÕþ¾Ö¶¯µ´ºÍÕ½ÕùƵ·±ËùÔì³ÉµÄ·¨Âɼ«²»Í³Ò»µÄÏÖÏó£¬ÄÃÆÆÂØÇ××ÔÖ÷³Ö±à׫ÁËһϵÁÐÖØÒª·¨µä¡£ÓÉ´Ë£¬·¨¹ú½¨Á¢ÆðÁ˱ȽÏÍ걸µÄ½ü´ú×ʲú½×¼¶·¨ÂÉÌåϵ¡£¡°ÄÃÆÆÂØÄ£Ê½¡±¾ÍÊÇÖ¸ÕâÖÖÒÔ¡¶ÄÃÆÆÂØ·¨µä¡·£¨¡¶·¨¹úÃñ·¨µä¡·£©Îª´ú±í£¬ÒÔ³ÉÎÄ·¨Îª±íÏÖÐÎʽµÄÁ¢·¨Ä£Ê½¡£¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡£
[6] ²Î¼û R. Caranta, Judicial Protection Against Member States: A New Jus Commune Takes Shape (1995) 32 CML Rev 703.
[7] S. Cassese, Toward a European Model of Public Administration, in: D.S. Clark (ed.), Comparative and Private International Law. Essays in Honor of John Henry Merryman on his Seventienth Birthday, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1990, p. 151; L. Torchia, Developments in Italian Administrative Law through Cross-fertilization, in: J. Beatson and T. Tridimas (eds.), New Directions in European Public Law, Oxford, Hart Publ., 1998, p. 137; S. Kadelbach, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht unter europaischem Einfluss, Tubingen, Mohr Siebeck, 1999.
[8] O. Mayer, Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1895.
[9] A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the study of the Law of the Constitution (1885), London, MacMillan, 1959, 10th ed. ¹ØÓÚÓë·¨¹ú·¨ÂÉÎÄ»¯µÄ±È½Ï£¬²Î¼û S. Flogaitis, Administrative law et Droit administratif, Paris, L.G.D.J., 1986.
[10] A.M. Sandulli, Il procedimento amministrativo, Milano, Giuffr¨¨, 1940.
[11] M.S. Giannini, Atto amministrativo, in Enciclopedia del diritto, IV, Milano, Giuffr¨¨, 1958.
[12] S. Cassese, Legislative regulation of adjudicative procedures, in Eur. Rev. of Publ. Law (special number), 1993, p. 15. Áí²Î¼û P. Craig, Procedures and Administrative decisionmaking: a common law perspective, ibidem, p. 55; D.J. Galligan, Due Process and Fair Procedures, Oxford, Clarendon, 1997.
[13] M.S. Giannini, Profili di un diritto amministrativo delle Comunit¨¤ europee, mimeo, Rome, 14 April 1967.
[14] P. Reuter, Organisations europ¨¦ennes, Paris, L.G.D.J., 1968, p. 253.
[15] EEC: Council Decision of 4 December 1962 on the Co-ordination of Policies on the Structure of Agriculture. ¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡£
[16] G. Majone, La Communaut¨¦ europ¨¦enne: un Etat r¨¦gulateur?, Paris, Montchrestien, 1996; E. Chiti, Le agenzie europee, Padua, Cedam, 2002.
[17] CFI, Case T-64/89, Automec [1990] ECR, II, p. 367. ·¨ÔºÈÏΪ£¬½ðÈںͷ´ÇãÏú³ÌÐòÒ²ÊÇÐÐÕþÐԵġ£
[18] CFI, Case T-54/99, max.mobil Telekommunikation Service Gmbh v. Commission, ÉÐδ¹«²¼¡£¹ØÓÚ¶ÔÅ·ÖÞίԱ»áËßËÏÖ°ÄܵķÖÎö£¬²Î¼û A.J. Gil Ibanez, A Comparative Study of the Roles of the Commission and National Administrations in the Supervision and Enforcement of EC Law, Oxford, Hart, 1999.
[19] Case T-54/99, paras. 19 and 54.
[20] Case T-54/99, para. 48.
[21] Case T-54/99, paras. 49 and 51.
[22] Case T-54/99, paras. 56-57. ÕâÒ»½øÕ¹Ô´Óڵ¹ú·¨Öιú¼Ò£¨RechtsStaat£©Ë¼ÏëµÄ¹Ûµã£¬ÊÇÓÉ A.Weber Ìá³öµÄ£¬²Î¼ûIl diritto amministrativo procedimentale nell¡¯ordinamento della Comunit¨¤ europea, in Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario, 1992, p. 393. C. Starck Ìá³öÁËͬÑùµÄ¹Ûµã£¬²Î¼ûDroits fondamentaux, Etat de droit et principe d¨¦mocratique en tant que fondements de la proc¨¦dure administrative non contentieuse, in: Eur. R. Publ. L., 1993, p. 31.
[23]¡¶Å·ÖÞ¹²Í¬ÌåÌõÔ¼¡·µÚ226Ìõ¹æ¶¨£º¡°Èç¹ûÅ·ÖÞίԱ»áÈÏΪһ³ÉÔ±¹úδÄÜÂÄÐб¾ÌõÔ¼¹æ¶¨µÄÒåÎñ£¬ÄÇôËüÓ¦¶Ô´Ë×÷³öÀíÓɳä·ÖµÄ¾ö¶¨£¬µ«ÊDZØÐë¸øÓèÓйسÉÔ±¹ú·¢±íÒâ¼ûµÄ»ú»á¡£Èç¹ûÓйسÉÔ±¹úδÄÜÔÚÅ·ÖÞίԱ»áÖ¸¶¨µÄÆÚÏÞÄÚÂÄÐиþö¶¨£¬Å·ÖÞίԱ»á¿ÉÒÔ½«¸ÃÊÂÏîÌύŷÖÞ·¨Ôº²Ã¾ö¡£¡±¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡£
[24] R. Rawlings ¶Ô´Ë½øÐÐÁË·ÖÎö£¬²Î¼û¡°Citizen Action and Institutional Attitudes in Commission Enforcement¡±, in: Eur. L. J (5), 2000, p. 4 ss.
[25] ÀýÈç H.P. Nehl£¬Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law, Oxford, Hart Publ., 1999 Ò»Ê鲢δ¿¼ÂdzÌÐòµÄ¸ÅÄî¡£
[26] ¿¶ûÉÈÏΪ£º¡°·¨ÂÉ´´ÖÆÈ¨ÍþËùÖÆ¶¨µÄ·¨Âɹ淶Êǹ涨ÐԵģ¨prescriptive£©£»·¨ÂÉ¿ÆÑ§Ëù³ÂÊöµÄ·¨ÂɹæÔòÈ´ÊÇÐðÊöÐԵģ¨descriptive£©¡£¡±£¨[°Â] ¿¶ûÉÖø¡¢Éò×ÚÁéÒ룬¡¶·¨Óë¹ú¼ÒµÄÒ»°ãÀíÂÛ¡·£¬Öйú´ó°Ù¿ÆÈ«Êé³ö°æÉç1996Äê°æ£¬µÚ49Ò³¡££©ÔÚ´Ë£¬×÷ÕßÖ¼ÔÚÇ¿µ÷³õÉó·¨Ôº´´ÉèµÄÐÐÕþ·¨ÔÔò¾ßÓз¨Âɹ淶µÄÐÔÖÊ¡£¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡£
[27] 30 May, Belvedere v. Italy and Carbonara v. Italy, in: Foro italiano, 2001, IV, p. 14.
[28] Judgment of 2 August 2001, Etia s.r.l. v. Italy, in: Giornale di diritto amministrativo, 2002, p. 631.
[29] S. Kadelbach, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht unter Europaschem Einfluss, cit.
[30] P. Reuter, Le recours de la Cour de Justice des Commanut¨¦s ¨¤ des principes g¨¦n¨¦raux de droit, in M¨¦langes Rolin, Paris, Pedone, 1964, p. 263 ss.; J.A. Usher, ¡®The influence of national concepts on decisions of the European Court¡¯, in: Eur. L. Rev. (1), 1976, p. 359 ss.
[31] H.J. Blanke, Vertrauenschutz im deutschen und europaischen Verwaltungsrecht, Tubingen, Mohr, 2000, ×÷ÕßÈÏΪŷÖÞ¹²Í¬Ìå¶ÔºÏ·¨ÐÔÆÚ´ý£¨legitimate expectation£©µÄ±£»¤ÊÇÒ»ÖÖ¡°¿ª´´ÐÔÐÐΪ¡±£¨ingerenz£©¡£
[32] ECJ, case 222/86, Unectef, ECR 1987, 4097; J. Schwarze (ed.), Administrative Law under European influence, London, Sweet and Maxwell, 1996; F. Hervouet, Politique jurisprudentielle de la Cour de Justice et des juridictions nationales: r¨¦cepetion du droit communautaire par le droit interne des Etats, in: Revue de Droit Public, 1992, p. 1257 et seq.
[33] C. Harlow ÊÇÒ»¸öÀýÍâ, ²Î¼û¡®Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State¡¯, in: Eur. L. J. (2), 1996, p. 199 ss. ²Î¼û A. Stone Sweet, Integration and the Europeanization of the Law, unpublished manuscript, 2002.
[34] C. Harlow, A Common European Law of Remedies?, in: C. Kilpatrick, T. Novitz and P. Stidmore (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe, Oxford, Hart, 2000, p. 73.
[35] S. Cassese, Il concerto regolamentare europeo delle telecomunicazioni, in: S. Cassese, Lo spazio giuridico globale, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2003, p. 105.
[36] ECJ, case 33/76, Rewe v. Landwirtschaftskammer Saarland [1976] ECR 1989, 1997. W. Van Gerven Ôø×¨ÃŶԴËÌá³öÁËÅúÆÀ£¬ ²Î¼û¡®The invader invaded or the need to uncover general principles common to the laws of the member states¡¯, in: G.C. Rodriguez Iglesias (ed.), M¨¦langes en hommage ¨¤ Fernand Schockweiler, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1999, p. 593. ÓйØÕâÒ»ÎÊÌâµÄÆÀÂÛ£¬²Î¼ûJ. Schwarze, ¡®Judicial Review in EC Law ¨C Some Reflections on the Origins and the Actual Legal Situation¡¯, in Int. Comp. L. Quart. (51), 2002, p. 17.
[37] ECJ, joined cases C-80, 81 and 82/99, Flemmer and Christoffel / EU Council and Commission,Leitensdorfer v. Bundesanstalt f¨¹r Landswirschaft und Ernahrung, ÉÐδ¹«²¼¡£
[38] ECJ, case C-312/93, Peterbroeck [1995] ECR I ¨C 4599; joined cases C-430/93 and 431/93, van Schijndel [1995] ECR I ¨C 4075. ¹ØÓڶԴ˵ÄÅúÆÀ£¬²Î¼û C. Harlow, Voices of Difference in a Plural Community, EUI Jean Monnet working paper no. 3/2000. G.C. Rodriguez Iglesias ±í´ïÁ˲»Í¬µÄ¿´·¨£¬²Î¼ûSui limiti dell¡¯autonomia procedimentale e processuale degli stati membri nell¡¯applicazione del diritto comunitario, in: Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario, 2001, p. 5 et seq.
[39] WT/DS46/AB/R Brazil ¨C Export Financing Programme for Aircraft, decision of 2 August 1999, para. 160.
[40] °üÀ¨Èý·Ý¾ö¶¨£º 1.ר¼ÒС×鱨¸æ£¬WT/DS58R, 15 May 1998; 2.ÉÏËß»ú¹¹±¨¸æ£¬WT/DS58/AB/R 12 October 1998; 3.ÉÏËß»ú¹¹±¨¸æ£¬WT/DS58/AB/RW, 22 October 2001. Èý¸ö°¸¼þ·Ö±ð±»¼ò³ÆÎª Shrimp I¡¢Shrimp II ºÍ Shrimp III. ¹ØÓÚÕâЩ°¸¼þµÄÑо¿£¬²Î¼û A. von Bogdandy, ¡®Law and Politics in the WTO¡¯, in: Max Planck Yearbook of International Law, 2000, p. 613; J. Scott, ¡®On Kith and Kine (and Crustaceans): Trade and Environment in the EU and WTO¡¯, in: J.H.H. Weiler (ed), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA. Towards A Common Law of International Trade, Oxford, 2000, p. 125 et seq.
[41] Shrimp II, para. 127.
[42] Shrimp II, para. 129; Shrimp III, para. 119. Áí²Î¼ûÉÏËß»ú¹¹±¨¸æ£¬United States ¨C Standard for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R, adopted 20 May 1996, para. 21-22.
[43] Shrimp II, para. 167-168. ²Î¼û T. Scovazzi (ed.), The Protection of the Environment in a context of regional economic integration. The Case of the European Community, the Mercosur and the NAFTA, Milan, Giuffr¨¨, 2002.
[44] Shrimp III, paras. 115, 122, commented by P. Trachtmann on the web site of Eur. J. of Int. L. <http://www.ejil.org>.
[45] Shrimp II, para. 180.
[46] Shrimp II, para. 141; E. Cannizzaro, The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures, in: Eu .J. Int. Law (12), 2001, p. 889.
[47] Shrimp III, para. 153.
[48] Shrimp II, para. 181.
[49] T. Daintith ¶ÔÃÀ¹úËù¾ßÓеģ¬ÒѾµÃµ½Ç¿»¯µÄ¡°Ö§ÅäµØÎ»¡±£¨hegemony£©½øÐÐÁËÆÀÂÛ£¬²Î¼û ¡®Exchange, response and competition: external perspectives on the United Kingdom constitution¡¯, in: Public Law, 2000, p. 165. ¹ØÓÚ˽·¨¹¤¾ßµÄÌÖÂÛ£¬²Î¼û P.N. Doremus, ¡®The Externalization of Domestic Regulation: Intellectual Property Rights in a Global Era¡¯, in: Indiana J. Of Global Legal Studies (3), 1996, no. 2, p. 1. ¹ØÓÚ¡¶Áª°îÐÐÕþ³ÌÐò·¨¡·Ó¦µ±ÊÊÓ¦ÐÂÇé¿ö×÷³öµ÷ÕûµÄ¹ÛµãÊÇÓÉ A. C. Aman, jr.Ìá³öµÄ£¬²Î¼û¡®Proposals for Reforming the Administrative Procedure Act: Globalization, Democracy and the Furtherance of a Global Public Interest¡¯, in: Ind. J. Global Legal Studies (6), 2001, p. 397.
[50] ²Î¼û A. Stone Sweet, ¡®The new GATT: Dispute Resolution and the Judicialization of the Trade Regime¡¯, in: M. Volcansek (ed.), Law Above Nations: Supranational Courts and the Legalization of Politics, Gainesville, University of Florida Press, 1999, p. 118; Y. Iwasawa, ¡®WTO Dispute Settlement as Judicial Supervision¡¯, in: J. of Int. Ec. Law (5), 2002, no. 2, p. 287.
[51] ¹ØÓÚ˽ÈË×éÖ¯ºÍ·ÇÕþ¸®×éÖ¯ÄÜ·ñ²ÎÓëGATT/WTOÕù¶Ë½â¾ö³ÌÐòµÄÎÊÌâ£¬Ôø¾ÒýÆðÁ˹㷺µÄÕùÂÛ¡£Á½Æðº£ëà°¸µÄר¼ÒС×鱨¸æ£¨·Ö±ðÓÚ1991ºÍ1994Äê×÷³ö£¬µ«Î´»ñµÃͨ¹ý£©ºÍϵÁк£¹ê°¸µÄ²Ã¾ö¶¼¶ÔÕâÒ»ÎÊÌâ×÷³öÁ˿϶¨µÄ»Ø´ð¡£´Ëºó£¬Å·ÃËÒ²½¨Á¢ÆðÁËÔÊÐí˽ÈË×éÖ¯²ÎÓë˾·¨³ÌÐòµÄ·¨ÂÉ»úÖÆ¡£²Î¼ûG. Shaffer, Defending Interests: Public-Private Parternship in WTO Litigation, Brookings Institution Press, 2003. ¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡£
[52] N.M. Blokker and H.G. Schermers (eds.), Proliferation of International Organizations, The Hague, Kluwer, 2001.
[53] ÔÚ¾¼ÃÈ«Çò»¯½ø³ÌÖУ¬¹ú¼ÒµÄ¹ÛÄîÖð½¥±»µ»¯¡£Í¬Ê±£¬Ë½ÈË×éÖ¯¿ÉÒÔÍ»ÆÆµØÓòÏÞÖÆ£¬ËüÃÇÔË×÷ЧÂʸߣ¬²¢ÓÐ×ŷḻµÄרҵ֪ʶºÍ¹ÜÀí¾Ñé¡£ÕâÖÖÈ«Çò»¯µÄ¾¼Ã»·¾³´Ùʹ¹«¹²Ö°ÄÜÔ½À´Ô½¶àµØ±»Î¯ÍиøË½ÈË×éÖ¯³Ðµ££¬´Ó¶øÐγÉÁËÒ»ÖÖ¹«/˽ÈÚºÏʽµÄ¡°ÐÂÕþ¸®ÖÎÀí¡±£¨new governance£©Ä£Ê½¡£Òò´Ë£¬Ë½Óл¯ÊÇÕþ¸®ÖÎÀí·½Ê½Ïò¶àÑù»¯·¢Õ¹µÄÖØÒª±êÖ¾¡£ÕâÖÖ¡°ÐÂÕþ¸®ÖÎÀí¡±Ä£Ê½º¸ÇÁ˸÷¼¶Õþ¸®ÎªÁËÂÄÐÐÖ°Ôð¶ø¿ÉÒÔÔËÓõÄһϵÁз½·¨£¬ÀýÈçºÏͬʽίÍС¢×ÊÖú¡¢Ë°ÊÕÖ§³ö¡¢´ú½ðȯ¡¢Ö±½Ó´û¿î¡¢Õþ¸®ÆóÒµÒÔ¼°ÌØÐí¾ÓªµÈ¡£²Î¼ûAlfred C. Aman, Jr., ¡®Globalization, Democracy, and the Need for a New Administrative Law¡¯, in: UCLA Law Rev. (49), 2002, p. 1687. ¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡£
[54] ¹ØÓÚÕâÒ»ÎÊÌ⣬N. Luhmann ×÷³öÁË»ù´¡ÐԵűÏ×£¬Legitimation durch Verfahren, Stuttgart, 1976, ¸ÃÊéÒý·¢Á˹㷺µÄÕùÂÛ£¬²Î¼û K.F. Rohl and S. Machura (eds.), Procedural Justice, Ashgate, Dartmouth, 1997. Áí²Î¼û D.J. Galligan, Due Process and Fair Procedures, cit., p. 350 et seq.
[55] R.B. Stewart, ¡®The Reformation of American Administrative Law¡¯, in: Harvard Law Rev. (88), 1975, p. 1670.
[56] ²Î¼û C. Harlow, ¡®European Administrative Law and the Global Challenge¡¯, in: P. Craig and G. de Bur?a (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 261.
[57] A. Chayes ºÍ A. Handler Chayes ¸ÅÊöÁËÐÂÖ÷Ȩ£¨the new sovereignty£©¹ÛÄî, ²Î¼ûThe New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Cambridge (Mass.), University Press, 1995; R.O. Keohane, ¡®Ironies of Sovereignty: the European Union and United States¡¯, in: J. Common Market St. (40), 2002, p. 743 et seq.
[58] ÑϸñµØ½²£¬ÔÚÅ·ÖÞ¹²Í¬·¨Ê±ÆÚ£¬lex alius lociÊÇÓëlex alterius lociÏà¶ÔÓ¦µÄ¸ÅÄǰÕßÖ¸ÆÕ±éÊÊÓÃÓÚ¶à¸öÃñ×åµÄ·¨ÂÉ£¬ºóÕßÔò½ö½öÖ¸Á½¸öÃñ×åÖ®¼ä¹²Í¬µÄ·¨ÂÉ¡£ÔÚµ±´ú£¬lex
alius lociͨ³£±»ÓÃÀ´ÃèÊöÒ»¹ú·¨¹ÙÔËÓÃËû¹ú·¨Âɺ͹ßÀýÉóÀí°¸¼þµÄÏÖÏó¡£ÕâÖÖÏÖÏóÔÚÈÕÒæÇ¿»¯µÄÅ·ÖÞÒ»Ì廯½ø³ÌÖÐÂżû²»ÏÊ¡£ ¡ª¡ªÒëÕß×¢¡£